|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张应强.“双一流”建设需要什么样的学科评估——基于学科评估元评估的思考[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(05):11-18.
 ZHANG Ying-Qiang.What?Kind?of?Discipline?Evaluation?Is?Neededfor?the?“Double?World-Class”?Construction——Reflection?Based?on?the?Meta-evaluationof?Discipline?Evaluation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(05):11-18.
点击复制

“双一流”建设需要什么样的学科评估——基于学科评估元评估的思考
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
11-18
栏目:
OA栏目
出版日期:
2019-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
What?Kind?of?Discipline?Evaluation?Is?Neededfor?the?“Double?World-Class”?Construction——Reflection?Based?on?the?Meta-evaluationof?Discipline?Evaluation
作者:
张应强
华中科技大学 教育科学研究院
Author(s):
ZHANG Ying-Qiang
School?of?Education,?Huazhong?University?of?Science?and?Technology
关键词:
“双一流”建设学科评估元评估评估制度创新
Keywords:
“Double World-Class” construction discipline evaluation Meta-evaluation evaluation system innovation
分类号:
G649.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国目前实施的学科评估主要是由政府部门主导的竞争性评估和问责性评估,其在促进高校“双一流”建设的同时,也产生了学科评估主导学科建设、学科排名竞争“白热化”等消极影响,以及学科建设中的“锦标赛效应”和“天花板效应”。原因在于学科评估的目的迷失和目的与手段的倒置。需要回归为学科建设和学科发展而评估的学科评估目的,确立“以评促建、评建结合、重在建设”的学科评估原则,特别是要引导和鼓励高校通过改革创新来开展“双一流”建设。
Abstract:
The present discipline evaluation in China mainly consists of the competitive evaluation and the assessment of accountability dominated by the government. While the evaluation promotes the “Double World-Class” Construction, it also exerts negative influence such as assessment leading discipline constructions and “heated” competition in discipline ranking, leading to the “tournament effect” and “ceiling effect” in discipline construction. The reason is that the aim of discipline evaluation is lost and the aim and means are inverted. It is necessary for the discipline evaluation to return to its purpose of promoting the construction and development of disciplines and establish an evaluation principle of “promoting construction with evaluation, combining evaluation with construction, and emphasizing construction rather than evaluation”. Especially, it should guide and encourage colleges and universities to carry out the “Double World-Class” construction through reform and innovation.

相似文献/References:

[1]余晖刘水云.世界一流大学如何培养教育政策人才?——对六种主流模式的分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):43.
[2]王荣 李联明.“双一流”建设重在立德树人[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(05):106.
 WANG Rong LI Lian-ming.Double First Class Construction Emphasizes Cultivation of First Class Talents of Lofty Morality[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(05):106.
[3]李曼丽 李明.英美两国一流大学教师资源的开发与留任机制探微——基于英美10所世界一流大学的案例分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(06):59.
 LI Man-li,LI Ming.Preliminary Research on Faculty Development and Retention Mechanism within First-class Universities: Case Study of 10 World-class Universities in Britain and the United States[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(05):59.
[4]王战军 刘 静.构建中国特色评价体系 推进世界一流大学建设[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(06):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
 WANG Zhan-jun LIU Jing.Constructing an Evaluation System with Chinese Characteristics and Promoting the Construction of World-class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(05):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
[5]翟亚军 王晴.“双一流”建设语境下的学科评估再造[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(06):45.
 ZHAI Ya-jun WANG Qing.On the Perfection of Evaluation of Disciplines in the Context of “Double First-Class Construction”[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(05):45.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-20