|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]翟亚军 王晴.“双一流”建设语境下的学科评估再造[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(06):45-51.
 ZHAI Ya-jun WANG Qing.On the Perfection of Evaluation of Disciplines in the Context of “Double First-Class Construction”[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):45-51.
点击复制

“双一流”建设语境下的学科评估再造
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
45-51
栏目:
双一流建设
出版日期:
2017-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Perfection of Evaluation of Disciplines in the Context of “Double First-Class Construction”
作者:
翟亚军1 王晴2
1.华北电力大学 高等教育研究所2.首都师范大学 研究生院
Author(s):
ZHAI Ya-jun1 WANG Qing2
1. Institute of higher education,North China Electric Power University2. Graduate School,Capital Normal University
关键词:
“双一流”建设一流学科学科评估学科排名
Keywords:
construction of Double Word-classworld-class disciplinesevaluation of disciplinesdiscipline ranking
分类号:
G649.21
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
随着“双一流”建设名单的尘埃落地,“双一流”建设的序幕全面拉开。“双一流”建设语境下,大学评估和学科评估面临着新的挑战。针对学科评估存在的窄化、泛化、矮化和固化等现象,从被忽略的评估局限、被夸大的评估功能,被扭曲的评估诉求三个方面进行原因剖析,指出要开展服务于我国世界一流学科建设的学科评估,要恪守去利益化、去行政化、去功利化三大原则,回归学科本真,坚守评估初心,立足国内,面向世界。
Abstract:
As the list of world-class universities and disciplines was released, the construction of Double Word-class has been carrying out. Under the context of construction of Double World-class, the evaluation of universities and disciplines faces many new challenges. For example, the world-class discipline evaluation is regarded as narrow, surface, under-qualified, stereotyped. Therefore, this study reveal reasons from three aspects – under-researched limitations, exaggerated functions and distorted demand of the discipline evaluation. The indicator system of evaluation required to be established. The evaluation of world-class disciplines should obey such principles as non-benefits, de-administration and anti-utilitarianism. It should return to the nature of discipline, back to the original purpose of evaluation, contributing to improve domestic situation and welcome the international views.

相似文献/References:

[1]余晖刘水云.世界一流大学如何培养教育政策人才?——对六种主流模式的分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):43.
[2]吴叶林 崔延强.基于学科文化创新的一流学科建设路径探论[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(05):89.
 WU Ye-lin CUI Yan-qiang.A Study on the Development Path of First-rate Discipline Based on the Discipline Culture Innovation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):89.
[3]王荣 李联明.“双一流”建设重在立德树人[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(05):106.
 WANG Rong LI Lian-ming.Double First Class Construction Emphasizes Cultivation of First Class Talents of Lofty Morality[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):106.
[4]李曼丽 李明.英美两国一流大学教师资源的开发与留任机制探微——基于英美10所世界一流大学的案例分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(06):59.
 LI Man-li,LI Ming.Preliminary Research on Faculty Development and Retention Mechanism within First-class Universities: Case Study of 10 World-class Universities in Britain and the United States[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):59.

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-20