|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]单捷飞何海燕.学科知识与组织系统:一个一流学科研究框架[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(05):94-104.
 SHAN Jie-fei??HE Hai-yan.Discipline Knowledge & Organization System: A Framework of the First-class Discipline Research[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(05):94-104.
点击复制

学科知识与组织系统:一个一流学科研究框架
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
94-104
栏目:
教育思想与理论
出版日期:
2021-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Discipline Knowledge & Organization System: A Framework of the First-class Discipline Research
作者:
单捷飞1何海燕2
1.北京理工大学 人文与社会科学学院;2.北京理工大学 管理与经济学院
Author(s):
SHAN Jie-fei1??HE Hai-yan2
1.School?of?Humanities?and?Social?Sciences,?Beijing?Institution?of?Technology; 2.School?of?Management?and?Economics,?Beijing?Institution?of?Technolog
关键词:
世界一流学科学科生态系统组织管理系统学科知识组织系统
Keywords:
world-class discipline discipline ecosystem organizational management system the system of discipline knowledge & organization
分类号:
G643
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
当前文献对于学科内涵与属性的界定大致包括两部分,一是包涵环境、制度、组织、权力等外界力量的“组织”属性,第二是来源于学科本质的“知识”属性。基于系统科学理论,结合学科的双重属性以及我国学科建设实践,提出学科知识与组织系统,重点论述了学科知识子系统模型、学科组织子系统模型以及“自组织-他组织”的耦合机理,同时从过程视角探讨了学科知识与组织系统的动态演化,构建一个一流学科研究的框架,阐释了一流学科生成的机理。
Abstract:
The definition of discipline connotation and attributes in current literature roughly includes two parts: one is the “organization” attribute including external forces such as environment, system, organization, and power; the other is the “knowledge” attribute derived from the essential attribute of discipline. Based on the system science theory, combined with the dual attributes of discipline and discipline construction practices in our country, this paper puts forward the system of discipline knowledge and organization consisting of the discipline knowledge sub-system and the discipline organization sub-system. The paper discusses the coupling mechanism of the “self-organizing and other organizing”, and explores the dynamic evolution of the system of discipline knowledge and organization from the perspective of the process. This paper constructs a research framework of the first-class discipline and explains the mechanism of the formation of the first-class discipline.

相似文献/References:

[1]屈廖健刘宝存.芝加哥大学社会学的学科建设史考察:兴起、路径及困境[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):48.
 QU Liao-jianLiu Bao-cun.The History of Discipline construction of Sociology at the University of Chicago: the Rise, Path and Dilemma[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(05):48.
[2]刘 莉 刘念才.“双一流”建设战略目标的分解研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(03):77.
 LIU Li LIU Nian-cai.Studies on the Strategic Goals of Double World-Class Initiative[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(05):77.
[3]姜 凡 刘念才.我国一流理科距离世界一流理科还有多远? ——基于高精尖评价指标体系的分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(06):21.
 JIANG Fan LIU Nian-cai.How Far Are the First-Class Science Disciplines of China Left Behind the World-Class Science Disciplines? ——Based on the Analysis of Top-Grade Indicators[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(05):21.
[4]元璠璠 王建华.俄罗斯世界一流大学建设“5-100计划”成效分析与启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(02):110.
 YUAN Fan-fan WANG Jian-hua.Effect Analysis and Enlightenment of “Project 5-100”for the Construction of World-Class Universities in Russia[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(05):110.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-20