[1]姜 凡 刘念才.我国一流理科距离世界一流理科还有多远？
——基于高精尖评价指标体系的分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(06):21-28.
JIANG Fan LIU Nian-cai.How Far Are the First-Class Science Disciplines of China Left Behind the World-Class Science Disciplines?
——Based on the Analysis of Top-Grade Indicators[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(06):21-28.
点击复制
我国一流理科距离世界一流理科还有多远？
——基于高精尖评价指标体系的分析
JIANG Fan LIU Nian-cai.How Far Are the First-Class Science Disciplines of China Left Behind the World-Class Science Disciplines? ——Based on the Analysis of Top-Grade Indicators[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(06):21-28.
清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]
- 卷:
- 期数:
- 2022年06期
- 页码:
- 21-28
- 栏目:
- 国际与比较教育
- 出版日期:
- 2022-12-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- How Far Are the First-Class Science Disciplines of China Left Behind the World-Class Science Disciplines? ——Based on the Analysis of Top-Grade Indicators
- Keywords:
- world-class disciplines; first-class science disciplines; disciplinary evaluation; top-grade indicators; international comparison
- 分类号:
- G649.2
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为明晰我国一流理科距离世界一流理科还有多远，本文遵循世界一流标准、甄选高精尖指标，构建了世界一流理科的高精尖评价指标体系。通过选取代表性的理科学科，对我国一流理科与世界一流理科进行了定量比较研究，并结合学科专家访谈的结果探析了部分高精尖指标表现差距大的原因。结果表明：我国一流理科的总体表现与世界一流理科存在明显的差距，特别是在重大原创性成果、国际学术大师等方面。建议针对我国一流理科的建设目标，改革评价体系，引导产出引领世界的重大原创性成果和国际学术大师。
- Abstract:
- To find out how far the First-Class Science Disciplines of China are Left Behind the World-Class Science Disciplines, this study builds a disciplinary evaluation system with top-grade indicators and quantitatively compares the performance of first-class science disciplines of China with world-class science disciplines. The results show significant gaps between the overall performance of first-class science disciplines in China and world-class science disciplines. Especially, there are major gaps in the performance of top-grade indicators such as breakthrough original research and academic masters or star scholars. Suggestions are made to reform the national and institutional evaluation systems to achieve the goal of constructing world-class science disciplines.
相似文献/References:
[1]屈廖健刘宝存.芝加哥大学社会学的学科建设史考察：兴起、路径及困境[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):48.
QU Liao-jianLiu Bao-cun.The History of Discipline construction of Sociology at the University of Chicago: the Rise, Path and Dilemma[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):48.
[2]刘 莉 刘念才.“双一流”建设战略目标的分解研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(03):77.
LIU Li LIU Nian-cai.Studies on the Strategic Goals of Double World-Class Initiative[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(06):77.
[3]单捷飞何海燕.学科知识与组织系统：一个一流学科研究框架[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(05):94.
SHAN Jie-fei??HE Hai-yan.Discipline Knowledge & Organization System: A Framework of the First-class Discipline Research[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(06):94.
[4]元璠璠 王建华.俄罗斯世界一流大学建设“5-100计划”成效分析与启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(02):110.
YUAN Fan-fan WANG Jian-hua.Effect Analysis and Enlightenment of “Project 5-100”for the Construction of World-Class Universities in Russia[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(06):110.