|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李曼丽.高等教育智能跃迁:一项历史比较研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(04):14-24.
 LI Man-li.The Intelligent Transformation of Higher Education: A Historical Comparative Study[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(04):14-24.
点击复制

高等教育智能跃迁:一项历史比较研究
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
14-24
栏目:
人工智能与教育
出版日期:
2024-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Intelligent Transformation of Higher Education: A Historical Comparative Study
作者:
李曼丽
清华大学 教育研究院
Author(s):
LI Man-li
Institute of Education, Tsinghua University
关键词:
生成式人工智能技术高等教育智能跃迁新型共享规范数智时代
Keywords:
generative AI technology higher education intelligent transformation new shared norms the era of digital intelligence
分类号:
G649.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
生成式人工智能技术与社会潜在变革动力深度捆绑,高等教育领域被认为是深受影响且亟待转型的主要领域之一。如何理解我国高等教育的智能跃迁?第一,通过回顾高等教育史上三次跃迁式发展,指出生成式人工智能技术因其性能的“优势非对称性”“高费效比性”可能成为大学跃迁发展的新变量。第二,基于对近50年自个人计算机广泛使用以来,技术迭代与文化滞后的关系梳理,阐明高等教育智能跃迁不只是回应技术引起的大学结构不均衡或关系不稳定,更应包含现代大学基本价值、规范秩序及其形成方式。第三,对近两年国内外若干大学智能跃迁的关键案例比较发现,现实中大学智能跃迁格局具有明显的“技术放大期”特征。就中国大学自身发展而言,基于生成式人工智能的流程再造则是大学新型共享规范得以制度化的关键期。
Abstract:
Generative AI technology (GenAI) is deeply intertwined with the potential forces of social transformation. The field of higher education is considered one of the primary areas significantly affected and requiring urgent transformation. How do we understand the intelligent transformation of higher education in China? Firstly, by reviewing the three major transformative developments in the history of higher education, the paper points out that GenAI technology may become a new variable for the development of universities due to its “asymmetric advantages” and “high cost-effectiveness.” Secondly, based on an analysis of the relationship between technological iteration and cultural lag in the past 50 years since the widespread use of personal computers, it is clarified that the intelligent transformation of higher education should not only respond to the structural imbalance or relational instability caused by technology but also include the basic values, norms, order, and their formation processes, inherent to modern universities. Thirdly, a comparative study of key intelligent transformation cases at several universities at home and abroad over the past two years reveals that the pattern of university intelligent transformation in reality has distinct characteristics of a “technology amplification period.” For the development of Chinese universities, the reengineering of processes based on GenAI is the key period for the institutionalization of new, shared norms in universities.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡娟.高等教育行业自律:美国经验与中国探索[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):60.
[2]李海龙.反思与治理我国高等教育的治理逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(05):78.
[3]周虹 陈时见.高等教育中外合作办学的现实困境与发展策略——基于利益相关者的视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):31.
[4]乔刚周文辉.高等教育质量监测数据平台建设——理念、框架与路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):57.
[5]西蒙·马金森文雯 胡雪龙.加州高等教育总体规划和加州高等教育系统的成败及对中国的意义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):1.
[6]姜添辉.制度化酬赏机制与新学术主义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):57.
[7]别敦荣 易梦春.普及化趋势与我国高等教育发展的战略选择 ——兼论两岸高等教育交流与合作[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):15.
 BIE Dun-rong YI Meng-chun.The Universal Trend and Development Strategies of Higher Education in China: with an Analysis of Cross-straits Exchanges and Cooperation on Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(04):15.
[8]於荣张斌贤.繁荣与调整:战后美国高等教育发展的历史轨迹[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):19.
 Yu RongZHANG Bin-xian.Prosperity and Adjustment: Exploring the History of the Development of Higher Education in the United States after the World War II[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(04):19.
[9]王志强.传承与超越:“威斯康星理念”的百年流变[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):57.
 WANG Zhi-qiang.Inheritance and Transcendence: the Evolution History of the Wisconsin Concept[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(04):57.
[10]柳 亮.帕森斯论美国高等教育[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.004608]
 LIU Liang.Talcott Parsons’ Discussion on American Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(04):46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.004608]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-20