«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:

期数:

2026年05期

页码:

165-174

栏目:

教育改革与发展

出版日期:

2026-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

The Logic and Pathways of Universities’ Service to National Strategies ——An Analysis Based on a Strategic Centrality-Spatiotemporal Urgency Framework

作者:

刘益东

国家教育行政学院 高校管理教研部

Author(s):

LIU Yi-dong

Department of University Management, National Academy of Education Administration

关键词:

国家战略; 高等教育; 战略中心度; 时空紧迫度; 理想类型

Keywords:

national strategy;  higher education;  strategic centrality;  spatiotemporal urgency;  ideal types

分类号:

G647

DOI:

10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.05.016510

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

随着大国博弈加剧与知识经济兴起，高等教育特别是高校服务国家战略的能力愈发成为国家综合实力竞争的关键要素。基于多学科理论，尝试构建了基于“战略中心度-时空紧迫度”的二维四象限分析框架，以阐释国家战略的理想类型以及高校服务国家战略的合法性机制及其具体行动策略。在关键防御与危机阻断区（Q1）遵循基于使命导向的工具理性；在战略威慑与体系韧性区（Q2）遵循基于本体安全的价值理性；在效率优化与应用赋能区（Q3）遵循基于资源依赖的交互逻辑；在未来竞争与范式引领区（Q4）遵循基于科学信托的储备逻辑。基于此，高校需要依赖制度激励与组织响应等中介机制，突破同质化倾向，通过宏观层面的分类生态位选择与微观层面的矩阵式敏捷治理，构建适应战略动态转化的治理体系。这一框架不仅厘清了中国高校服务国家战略的合法性基础，也为全球高等教育治理提供了理性的认知工具。

Abstract:

As great-power competition intensifies and the knowledge economy continues to rise, higher education—in particular, universities’ capacity to serve national strategies—has increasingly become central to national competitiveness. Drawing on multidisciplinary theories, this paper proposes a two-dimensional,four-quadrant analytical framework based on “strategic centrality” and “spatiotemporal urgency” to elucidate ideal types of national strategies and to explain the legitimacy mechanisms and concrete action strategies through which universities can serve these strategies. In Quadrant 1 (Critical Defense & Crisis Containment),universities should adhere to mission-driven instrumental rationality; in Quadrant 2 (Strategic Deterrence &Systemic Resilience), they should follow value rationality grounded in ontological security; in Quadrant 3(Ef?ciency Optimization & Applied Empowerment), they should operate according to an interaction logic based on resource dependence; and in Quadrant 4 (Future Competition & Paradigm Leadership), they should embrace a reserve logic rooted in scientific trusteeship. To realize these roles effectively, universities must leverage mediating mechanisms such as institutional incentives and organizational responses to overcome tendencies toward homogenization. At the macro level, they should pursue differentiated ecological niche positioning; at the micro level, they should implement matrix-based agile governance—thereby constructing a governance system capable of adapting to dynamic changes in national strategies. This framework not only clari?es the legitimacy foundation for Chinese universities’ engagement with national strategies but also offers a rational cognitive tool for global higher education governance.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-10-20