|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]骆嘉惠.在生成式人工智能时代重新思考何为“原创”:高等教育的角色和目的[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(01):79-85.
 LUO Jia-hui.Rethinking “Original Work” in the GenAI Age: The Role and Purpose of Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(01):79-85.
点击复制

在生成式人工智能时代重新思考何为“原创”:高等教育的角色和目的
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2025年01期
页码:
79-85
栏目:
人工智能与教育
出版日期:
2025-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rethinking “Original Work” in the GenAI Age: The Role and Purpose of Higher Education
作者:
骆嘉惠
香港教育大学 教育政策与领导学系
Author(s):
LUO Jia-hui
Department of Education Policy and Leadership, Education University of Hong Kong
关键词:
人工智能高等教育原创学术诚信抄袭
Keywords:
artificial intelligence higher education original academic integrity plagiarism
分类号:
G649.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
人工智能在当下高等教育政策话语中常常被视作一种游离于学生独立努力与智力贡献之外的外部辅助形式,进而对学生功课的原创性形成潜在威胁。然而,在当今知识生产日益呈现出协作化、分布化、人工智能介导化的态势下,究竟何种工作或作品方可称之为“原创”?若学生使用人工智能辅助完成功课,是否必然意味着该学生的功课不再属于“原创性工作”也不再“独立”?围绕上述问题,本文结合实证研究对生成式人工智能时代下何为原创性工作这一议题展开反思与讨论。文章对当前高等教育政策语境下原创性工作的定义、原创性定义背后的价值取向与未来人才培养、生成式人工智能时代下的原创性工作几大主题进行分析,并在文末针对高等教育的角色和目的提出相应建议。
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence is often perceived as an external form of assistance separate from students’ independent efforts and intellectual contributions in the current higher education policy discourse, hence undermining the originality of students’ work. However, in a time when knowledge production becomes increasingly collaborative, distributed and AI-mediated, questions arise as to what kind of work could be considered truly “original”. If a student uses artificial intelligence to assist in their work, does that necessarily mean their work is no longer “original” or “independent”? With these questions in mind, the author discusses and reflects on the meaning of original work in the age of generative artificial intelligence. The paper draws on empirical data to illustrate how original work is being defined in the current education policy context, the value orientation underpinning “originality” and its association with talent cultivation, and the complexities around defining original work in the digital age. The paper concludes with suggestions for higher education stakeholders to rethink original work and provide a more inclusive environment for students to thrive.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡娟.高等教育行业自律:美国经验与中国探索[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):60.
[2]李海龙.反思与治理我国高等教育的治理逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(05):78.
[3]周虹 陈时见.高等教育中外合作办学的现实困境与发展策略——基于利益相关者的视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):31.
[4]乔刚周文辉.高等教育质量监测数据平台建设——理念、框架与路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):57.
[5]西蒙·马金森文雯 胡雪龙.加州高等教育总体规划和加州高等教育系统的成败及对中国的意义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):1.
[6]姜添辉.制度化酬赏机制与新学术主义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):57.
[7]别敦荣 易梦春.普及化趋势与我国高等教育发展的战略选择 ——兼论两岸高等教育交流与合作[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):15.
 BIE Dun-rong YI Meng-chun.The Universal Trend and Development Strategies of Higher Education in China: with an Analysis of Cross-straits Exchanges and Cooperation on Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):15.
[8]於荣张斌贤.繁荣与调整:战后美国高等教育发展的历史轨迹[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):19.
 Yu RongZHANG Bin-xian.Prosperity and Adjustment: Exploring the History of the Development of Higher Education in the United States after the World War II[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):19.
[9]王志强.传承与超越:“威斯康星理念”的百年流变[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):57.
 WANG Zhi-qiang.Inheritance and Transcendence: the Evolution History of the Wisconsin Concept[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):57.
[10]柳 亮.帕森斯论美国高等教育[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.004608]
 LIU Liang.Talcott Parsons’ Discussion on American Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.004608]
[11]迈克尔·彼得斯.“云思维”:大学在人工智能驱动知识生态系统中的制胜之道[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(05):1.
 Michael A. Peters.“Minds in the Cloud”: Futureproofing the University in an AI-Driven Knowledge Ecosystem[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(01):1.
[12]让-克洛德·鲁阿诺-博巴兰.人工智能对高等教育的变革性影响:当前趋势与未来方向之批判性反思[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(05):13.
 Jean-Claude Ruano-Borbalan.The Transformative Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education: A Critical Reflection on Current Trends and Futures Directions[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(01):13.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-20