|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙天慈??孟 宇.英国创新模式下的产学研合作落后于美国?——基于大学知识生产与转移的考察[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(01):137-148.
 SUN Tian-ci MENG Yu.Is the Industry-university-research Cooperation Innovation in UK behind that in US?——Based on the Academic Knowledge Production and Transfer in Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(01):137-148.
点击复制

英国创新模式下的产学研合作落后于美国?——基于大学知识生产与转移的考察
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
137-148
栏目:
国际与比较教育
出版日期:
2022-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Is the Industry-university-research Cooperation Innovation in UK behind that in US?——Based on the Academic Knowledge Production and Transfer in Universities
作者:
孙天慈1??孟 宇2?
1.华东师范大学 教育学部;2.香港中文大学 教育行政与政策学系
Author(s):
SUN Tian-ci1 MENG Yu2
1.Faculty?of?Education,?East?China?Normal?University; 2.Department?of?Educational?Administration?and?Policy,?Chinese?University?of?Hong?Kong
关键词:
创新高等教育产学研合作知识生产与转移
Keywords:
innovation higher education industry-university-research cooperation knowledge production and transfer
分类号:
G649.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
知识经济时代的科学、技术、经济一体化促使美英两国重视产学研协同创新,美国和英国分别形成了合作式创新生态和竞争式创新机制。美国在制度支持和产学研合作的良性循环中激活了学术知识的经济引擎作用。而英国低水平、不合理的政策干预未能扭转校企相对隔离的状态,大学在市场机制影响下难以充分发挥高质量学术知识的预期经济效益。为有效促进学术知识的生产与转移,政府应在国家创新体系中合理施为,成为政策目标的执行者、信息沟通的桥梁、政策实效的支持系统,直接并积极参与创新生态的构建、激活并稳固产学研合作的社会基础、保障创新活动的质量,促进产学研合作以保障国家创新的可持续发展。
Abstract:
The integration of science, technology and economy in the era of knowledge economy prompts both the United Kingdom and the United States to attach great importance to industry-university-research collaboration. The United States and the United Kingdom have respectively formed collaborative innovation ecology and competitive innovation mechanism. With the institutional support and a virtuous circle of industry-university-research cooperation, the United States has activated the economic-engine function of academic knowledge. In contrast, the low-level and unreasonable policy intervention in the United Kingdom failed to change the situation of separation between universities and enterprises. British universities find it difficult to efficiently transfer high-quality academic knowledge to expected economic benefits under the market mechanism. In order to ensure the innovation sustainability to effectively promote academic knowledge production and transfer, the government should take reasonable measures in the national innovation system by playing the roles as the executant of policy objectives, the linkage of information communication and the support system of policy effectiveness to directly and actively participate in the construction of innovation ecology, activate and stabilize the social foundation of industry-university-research cooperation and guarantee the quality of innovation activities.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡娟.高等教育行业自律:美国经验与中国探索[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):60.
[2]易红郡.英国近现代大学精神的创新[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(5):31.
[3]李海龙.反思与治理我国高等教育的治理逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(05):78.
[4]周虹 陈时见.高等教育中外合作办学的现实困境与发展策略——基于利益相关者的视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):31.
[5]乔刚周文辉.高等教育质量监测数据平台建设——理念、框架与路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):57.
[6]西蒙·马金森文雯 胡雪龙.加州高等教育总体规划和加州高等教育系统的成败及对中国的意义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):1.
[7]姜添辉.制度化酬赏机制与新学术主义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):57.
[8]别敦荣 易梦春.普及化趋势与我国高等教育发展的战略选择 ——兼论两岸高等教育交流与合作[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):15.
 BIE Dun-rong YI Meng-chun.The Universal Trend and Development Strategies of Higher Education in China: with an Analysis of Cross-straits Exchanges and Cooperation on Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):15.
[9]於荣张斌贤.繁荣与调整:战后美国高等教育发展的历史轨迹[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):19.
 Yu RongZHANG Bin-xian.Prosperity and Adjustment: Exploring the History of the Development of Higher Education in the United States after the World War II[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):19.
[10]王志强.传承与超越:“威斯康星理念”的百年流变[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):57.
 WANG Zhi-qiang.Inheritance and Transcendence: the Evolution History of the Wisconsin Concept[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):57.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-20