[1]李 强 孙亚梅.去哪上大学？——高等教育就学地选择的影响因素研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(06):37-46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.003710]
LI Qiang SUN Ya-mei.Where?to?Take?Higher?Education?——A?Study?of?the?Influential?Factors?on?Location?Choice?for?Higher?Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(06):37-46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.003710]
点击复制
去哪上大学？——高等教育就学地选择的影响因素研究
LI Qiang SUN Ya-mei.Where?to?Take?Higher?Education?——A?Study?of?the?Influential?Factors?on?Location?Choice?for?Higher?Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(06):37-46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.003710]
清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]
- 卷:
- 期数:
- 2018年06期
- 页码:
- 37-46
- 栏目:
- 教育与社会
- 出版日期:
- 2018-12-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Where?to?Take?Higher?Education?——A?Study?of?the?Influential?Factors?on?Location?Choice?for?Higher?Education
- Keywords:
- higher education; educational location; college students
- 分类号:
- G40-052
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 高等教育就学地的选择，既包括对高校的选择，也包括对城市的选择。本文基于2017-2018年对全国14个省份19所本科院校共2747名在校学生的问卷调查，从影响主体、个人动机、城市因素、大学因素四个方面分析影响学生高等教育就学地选择的因素。数据显示，在选择就学地时，父母是最重要的影响主体，其次是亲友社会网络，而市场的介入程度还不高；学生的高等教育动机呈现实用性与价值性并存的特点，且提出了更高的国际化要求；在选择就学城市上，教育质量和发达程度最受重视；在选择学校上，学校排名和专业排名已成为最重要的参考指标。基于此，本文对完善高校招生工作提出几点建议。
- Abstract:
- The location choice of higher education includes both university choice and city choice. Based on the 2017-2018 survey data of 2,747 students from 19 universities of 14 provinces of China, this paper analyzes the factors affecting students’ location choices for higher education from four aspects: influential subject, individual motivation, city attributes and university factors. The data shows that: Parents are the most important influencing subject, followed by the social network of relatives and friends, whereas the consulting market is not playing an important role. Students’ show both practical-oriented and value-oriented motivation for higher education, and have increasing demand for internationalization. Regarding the choice of city, the quality of education and the level of economic development are the concerns of most students. As for university choice, general university rankings and specific major rankings have become the most important references. Based on the findings, this paper puts forward some suggestions for improving the enrollment work of universities.
相似文献/References:
[1]胡娟.高等教育行业自律:美国经验与中国探索[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):60.
[2]李海龙.反思与治理我国高等教育的治理逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(05):78.
[3]周虹 陈时见.高等教育中外合作办学的现实困境与发展策略——基于利益相关者的视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):31.
[4]乔刚周文辉.高等教育质量监测数据平台建设——理念、框架与路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(01):57.
[5]西蒙·马金森文雯 胡雪龙.加州高等教育总体规划和加州高等教育系统的成败及对中国的意义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):1.
[6]姜添辉.制度化酬赏机制与新学术主义[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):57.
[7]别敦荣 易梦春.普及化趋势与我国高等教育发展的战略选择
——兼论两岸高等教育交流与合作[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):15.
BIE Dun-rong YI Meng-chun.The Universal Trend and Development Strategies of Higher Education in China: with an Analysis of Cross-straits Exchanges and Cooperation on Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):15.
[8]於荣张斌贤.繁荣与调整：战后美国高等教育发展的历史轨迹[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):19.
Yu RongZHANG Bin-xian.Prosperity and Adjustment: Exploring the History of the Development of Higher Education in the United States after the World War II[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):19.
[9]王志强.传承与超越：“威斯康星理念”的百年流变[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):57.
WANG Zhi-qiang.Inheritance and Transcendence: the Evolution History of the Wisconsin Concept[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(06):57.
[10]柳 亮.帕森斯论美国高等教育[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.004608]
LIU Liang.Talcott Parsons’ Discussion on American Higher Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(06):46.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.004608]