|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘远杰.迈向教育更加公平:县域教育改革的空间尺度、问题及其破解[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(05):114-125.
 LIU Yuan-jie??.Towards a More Equitable Education: On the Space Criteria, Problems and Solutions of Chinese Educational Reform at the County Level[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(05):114-125.
点击复制

迈向教育更加公平:县域教育改革的空间尺度、问题及其破解
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
114-125
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2021-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Towards a More Equitable Education: On the Space Criteria, Problems and Solutions of Chinese Educational Reform at the County Level
作者:
刘远杰12
1.广西师范大学 教育学部 ;2.广西民族教育发展研究中心
Author(s):
LIU Yuan-jie1??2
Institute of International and Comparative Education, Beijing Normal University
关键词:
教育改革县域教育教育公平教育高质量发展
Keywords:
burden reduction in primary and secondary schools off-school training institutions capital expansion governance
分类号:
G521
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
县域具有市域、省域难以具备的心理、情感与价值内聚力及社会空间的严密结构性,县域教育改革更易形成一种作为文化传统的教育惯性或教育环境,直接推动县域内城乡融合背景下教育公平的实现。县在中国行政格局中充当“上”“下”行政空间的“度”,在中国教育改革实践中具有主体性、自足性和灵活性。审视当下县域教育样态,县域内部存在的多重教育空间区隔与分层问题,消耗了县域教育空间的整体凝聚感和教育价值力;县域空间本身的自足性所隐含的自我空间封闭,遏制了县域教育公共品性的活力与发生,县域教育改革与发展步履艰难。新时代我国教育改革一方面应继续彰显“县域”空间方法与价值的尺度,一方面须破除县域“内外”教育空间的区隔与分层问题,发展县域教育空间辩证法,形成教育空间的深度对话,确立县域教育改革空间正义,实现县域教育的社会公共属性,迈向更加公平和更高质量的县域教育。
Abstract:
Social forces have played a positive role in the development of education in China. After nearly 40 years’ development, the capital hidden behind social forces has been expanding increasingly. The continuous expansion in education has brought not only some new concepts and fashions but also a large number of meaningless and even harmful educational products, which plague families, schools, and society a lot. The explicit manifestation of capital expansion in education is the rapid expansion of off-school training institutions and the online education market, the rapid increase in educational advertising and marketing costs, and the continuous establishment and expansion of private education groups. The implicit manifestation is the spread of the educational concepts of neoliberalism. The continuous expansion of capital has severely endangered students’ physical and mental health, family happiness, school teaching order, social educational values, and educational equity and quality. Therefore, in order to change this situation, restore the public welfare nature of education, and ensure fairness, China needs to improve the capital governance system in education in following ways: further revising relevant laws based on strict compliance with existing laws and regulations to limit the scope of capital activities in education, consolidating and expanding the functions of schools to improve the education quality of public schools, increasing the benefits of teachers in public primary and secondary schools and effectively protecting their rights and interests to stabilize the faculty team and ensure the quality of teaching.

相似文献/References:

[1]涂端午.深化教育改革中的决策风险防控[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(02):32.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.02.003206]
 TU Duan-wu.Prevention?and?Control?of?Decision-making?Risk?in?Deepening?Education?Reform[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(05):32.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.02.003206]
[2]高 原.公共知识分子与教育改革的公共领域 ——戴安·拉维奇批判标准化教育改革的斗争实践[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(03):43.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.03.004308]
 GAO Yuan.Public Intellectual and the Public Sphere of Education Reform——the Practiceof Diane Ravitch’s Critiquing the Standardized Education Reform in America[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(05):43.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.03.004308]
[3]石中英.回到教育的本体 ——顾明远先生对于教育本质和教育价值的论述[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(05):4.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.05.000408]
 SHI Zhong-ying.Back to the Ontology of Education:GuMing-yuan’s Argument on the Essence an dValues of Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(05):4.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.05.000408]
[4]高 杭.以整体性治理助力学前教育改革发展[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(05):112.
 GAO Hang.Advancing?the?Reform?and?Development?of?PreschoolEducation?by?Holistic?Governance[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(05):112.
[5]逯 行?黄荣怀.智能时代的教育改革:教育社会实验的演化及其价值回应[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(01):42.
 LU Hang?HUANG Rong-huai.Educational Change in the Age of Intelligence: The Evolution and Value Response of Educational Social Experiments[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(05):42.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-20