|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]能建国.利益、控制与信用:基于SZY大学产学研合作的案例研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(03):86-97.
 NENG Jian-guo.Interest, Control and Credit:A Case Study on the Industry-University-Research Collaboration of SZY-University[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(03):86-97.
点击复制

利益、控制与信用:基于SZY大学产学研合作的案例研究
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
86-97
栏目:
学位与研究生教育
出版日期:
2020-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Interest, Control and Credit:A Case Study on the Industry-University-Research Collaboration of SZY-University
作者:
能建国
北京大学 教育学院
Author(s):
NENG Jian-guo
Graduate School of Education, Peking University
关键词:
大学产学研合作利益控制信用
Keywords:
university industry-university-institute cooperation interest control credit
分类号:
G644
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
改革开放以来,高校与企业的产学研合作快速发展,信用纠纷日渐增多却普遍“无解”,给产学研合作的健康发展带来了负面影响。学术界对此现象进行了初步揭示,但是缺乏深入扎实的案例研究和理论建构。本文以信用理论解释为工具,采取案例研究方法,对SZY大学产学研合作情况进行了为期近6年的调查,对信用纠纷的表现和原因进行了分析,发现单纯的市场机制或社会机制对于确保合作信用都具有局限性,以至于近年来国家对高校的产学研合作进行了整改和整顿。在此基础上,本文对现有的信用理论解释进行了反思,并作出了初步的修正完善。
Abstract:
Since the Reform and Opening up, with the fast development of the industry-university-research collaboration between university and enterprise, credit disputes became a growing but unsolved phenomenon, which has brought negative impact on the healthy development of industry-university-research collaboration. Previous literature has examined this issue preliminarily, but there is few in-depth and solid case studies and theoretical construction. Based on theories of credit and taking a case study approach, this study investigated the industry-university-research collaboration at SZY University over a period of almost six years, and analyzed the manifestation and causes of cooperative credit disputes. It is found that a simple market or social mechanism alone has limitations for ensuring cooperative credit, so much so that in recent years, the government has carried out rectification on the industry-university-research collaboration between university and enterprise. On this basis, this paper reflects on the existing credit theory, and makes a preliminary revision and improvement of the theory.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘进沈红.大学教师流动与学术职业发展:基于对二战后的考察[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):43.
[2]於 荣.美国大学通识教育课程一致性问题的历史发展及启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):32.
[3]马永斌 柏喆.大学创新创业教育的实践模式研究与探索[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):99.
[4]赵荣辉 周作宇.论大学德治[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(06):10.
[5]黄建伟.美国政府对大学学术自由的介入及其权力边界[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(05):68.
 HUANG Jian-wei.American Governments’ Intervention in Academic Freedom of Universities and Their Power Boundary[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(03):68.
[6]刘文澜 聂风华.MIT多组织、开放式创业生态系统探析[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(05):97.
 LIU Wen-lan NIE Feng-hua.A?Research?on?MIT?Multi-organization?and?OpenEntrepreneurship?Ecosystem[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(03):97.
[7]刘 路 洪 茜 李瑞琳 Hamish Coates.美、澳、日三国评价大学社会服务的经验与启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(01):134.
 LIU Lu HONG Xi LI Rui-lin Hamish COATES.On the Evaluation of University’s Contribution to Society: The Practice and Enlightenment from America, Australia and Japan[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(03):134.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-20