|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张佳慧 辛 涛.15岁学生幸福感的影响机制探讨 ——来自中国四省市PISA2018的证据[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(05):11-19.
 ZHANG Jia-hui XIN Tao.Exploring the Influencing Mechanism of the Well-being of 15-year old Students: Evidence from the PISA2018 Survey in China’s Four Provinces[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(05):11-19.
点击复制

15岁学生幸福感的影响机制探讨 ——来自中国四省市PISA2018的证据
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年05期
页码:
11-19
栏目:
基础教育
出版日期:
2020-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Exploring the Influencing Mechanism of the Well-being of 15-year old Students: Evidence from the PISA2018 Survey in China’s Four Provinces
作者:
张佳慧 辛 涛
北京师范大学 中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心
Author(s):
ZHANG Jia-hui XIN Tao
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University
关键词:
幸福感PISA社会支持心理韧性家庭社会经济地位
Keywords:
subjective well-being PISA social support psychological resiliencesocio-economic status
分类号:
G635.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
中国四省市在PISA2018三项核心素养上表现优异,但学生幸福感在国际比较中仅处于中等或中等偏下的水平。为解决如何提升学生幸福感的问题,本研究采用PISA2018中国四省市问卷数据,探索学生幸福感的影响机制。研究发现,社会支持(家长、教师以及同伴情感支持)对不同家庭社会经济地位学生的影响不同;积极情绪在心理韧性和生活满意度之间起部分中介作用。本文从家庭、学校以及心理韧性的培养等角度,提出了提升学生幸福感的建议。
Abstract:
China’s four provinces outperformed all other participating countries and regions on the three key literacies assessed in PISA2018, while the well-being of students was at a much lower level. To address the question of how to improve students’ well-being, this study used the survey data of PISA2018 to explore the influencing mechanism of adolescent students’ subjective well-being. We found that social support (i.e., parent, teacher, and peer emotional support) had differential influences on the well-being of social economically advantaged and disadvantaged students; positive emotions mediated the relationship between psychological resilience and life satisfaction. The paper concluded with a discussion on how to improve student well-being from the perspectives of family, school, and the cultivation of psychological resilience.

相似文献/References:

[1]王蕾,佟威.能力考查:PISA命题对高考命题的启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):93.
[2]周金燕.15周岁学生如何看待学校教育的适应性——来自中国上海PISA的证据及影响因素分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(02):80.
[3]辛涛 姜宇王旭冉.从教育机会到学习机会:教育公平的微观视域[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(02):18.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.02.001807]
 XIN Tao JIANG YuWANG Xu-ran.From?Opportunity?of?Education?to?Opportunity?to?Learn:A?New?Perspective?of?Educational?Equity[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(05):18.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.02.001807]
[4]王 熙.反思PISA影响力的科学权威—— 基于媒介研究视角的分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(05):91.
 Wang Xi.A?Reflection?on?the?Scientific?Authority?of?PISA’sInfluence:?From?the?Perspective?of?Media?Studies[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(05):91.
[5]刘 骥 张 晋 李延平.国际学业评价对教育舆情的隐性影响 ——基于美国民意态度的审思[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(04):122.
 LIU Ji ZHANG Jin LI Yan-ping.International Large-scale Student Assessments and their Less-visible Side Effects: ——An Investigation of Public Opinion in the United States[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(05):122.
[6]姜添辉 李子华.新自由主义治理性视角下PISA传输的国际比较与数据治理之作用[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(05):103.
 CHIANG Tien-hui LI Zi-hua.The Functions of International Comparisons and Data Governance Transmitted by PISA from the Perspective of Neoliberal Governmentality[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(05):103.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01