|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陆 一?杨 曈.高教大众化视野下中国大学通识教育发展的理论分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(04):36-46.
　LU Yi ?YANG Tong.Theoretical?Analysis?on?the?Development?of?General?Educationin?Chinese?Universities?from?the?Perspective?ofPopularization?of?Higher?Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):36-46.
点击复制

高教大众化视野下中国大学通识教育发展的理论分析
分享到：

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
36-46
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2020-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Theoretical?Analysis?on?the?Development?of?General?Educationin?Chinese?Universities?from?the?Perspective?ofPopularization?of?Higher?Education
作者:
陆 一1?杨 曈2
1.复旦大学 高等教育研究所 2.东南大学 外国语学院
Author(s):
LU Yi1 ?YANG Tong2
1.Research Institute for Higher Education, Fudan University 2.School of Foreign Languages, Southeast University
关键词:
通识教育; 中国文明传统; 高等教育目标结构; 又红又专; 理工类大学; 行业类大学
Keywords:
general education;  Chinese civilization tradition;  goal structure of higher education;  red and specialized;  science and engineering university;  industry university
分类号:
G649.2
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
自从20世纪80年代过度狭窄的专业教育的弊病被提出，到2015年后通识教育改革得到官方承认并在更多大学发展深化，中国大学通识教育改革经历了从模仿借鉴到独立生成的发展过程。不仅如此，通识教育的兴起与猛烈的大学扩招几乎同时发生，这是中国特有的历史过程。改革的叠加效应造成诸多混淆。在已然大众化的高等教育格局之下，通识教育既要弥补精英阶段未成熟的人文教育及其对专业教育的作用，也要拓展在国民教育和职业教育方面的贡献。本文试图结构化地分析高等教育大众化后本科通识教育应当做什么，如何走出分层分类建设之路，并澄清中国大学通识教育发展实践中的理论问题。
Abstract:
The disadvantage of excessively narrow professional education was put forward in 1980s. After 2015, the reform of general education was officially recognized and deepened in more universities. The reform of general education in Chinese universities experienced a development process from imitation to independent generation. Moreover, the rise of general education and the fierce expansion of university enrollment almost occurred at the same time, which is a unique historical process. The superposition effect of reform has caused many confusions. Under the popularization of higher education, general education should not only make up for the immature humanistic education in the elite stage and its role in professional education, but also expand its contribution to national civic education and vocational education. This paper attempts to make a structural analysis of what undergraduate general education should do after popularization, and clarify the theoretical problems in the development practice of general education in Chinese universities.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈洪捷.中国古代通识教育的传统及其问题———知识的视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):21.
[2]於 荣.美国大学通识教育课程一致性问题的历史发展及启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):32.
[3]陆 一,徐 渊.制名以指实：“通识教育”概念的本语境辨析[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(03):30.
[4]黄福涛.美国大学的自由教育和通识教育是如何产生和变化的？[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(06):1.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.000109]
　HUANG Fu-tao.How did the US Liberal Education and General Education emerge and change?[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(04):1.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.000109]
[5]鲍大卫李联明.常青藤文化与哈佛大学的体育发展[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(01):114.
　BAO Da-wei??LI Lian-ming.The?Ivy?League?Culture?and?The?Athletics?Development?Of?Harvard[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(04):114.
[6]吴易林 吕林海.塑造全球能力:美国大学通识教育的路径机制 ——以哈佛大学、斯坦福大学的通识课程为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(05):78.
　WU Yi-lin LYU Lin-hai.Shaping Students’ Global Competence: An Analysis of the Path Mechanism of General Education in American Universities ——Take the General Education Curriculum of Harvard University and Stanford University as Examples[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(04):78.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-20