|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]覃云云.橘生淮北则为枳?——跨境合作大学的制度两难[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(01):119-125.
 QIN Yun-yun.Same Seed, Different Flavor? The Institutional Dilemmas of Cross-border Joint-universities in China[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(01):119-125.
点击复制

橘生淮北则为枳?——跨境合作大学的制度两难
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
119-125
栏目:
国际与比较研究
出版日期:
2020-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Same Seed, Different Flavor? The Institutional Dilemmas of Cross-border Joint-universities in China
作者:
覃云云
香港大学 教育学院
Author(s):
QIN Yun-yun
Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong
关键词:
跨境高等教育中外合作办学新制度主义制度距离
Keywords:
cross-border higher education Sino-foreign cooperation institutionalism institutional dilemmas
分类号:
G648.9
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究以目前中国境内已有的跨境合作大学作为研究对象,应用组织社会学中的制度主义理论,采用质性研究方法,主要探讨了跨境合作大学在成立过程中的制度两难现象。跨境合作大学的制度两难主要体现在组织与环境之间的制度距离,具体体现在政策法律、社会规范与文化认知三个层面。本研究回应了新制度主义理论对于制度环境塑造组织特征的强调,分析了跨境合作大学产生制度两难的种种原因。
Abstract:
This research examined the institutional dilemmas in the process of building cross-border joint-universities in China by applying institutional theory in organizational sociology and using qualitative research methods. The dilemmatic features of cross-border joint-universities were manifested in the institutional distance between the organizations and the environment, which were specifically shown in the regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive aspects. This research echoed new institutionalism by stressing the role the institutional environment plays in the organization and demonstrated major reasons why institutional dilemmas develop in the Chinese context.

相似文献/References:

[1]李向明 孙春柳董宇涵.研究生教育中外合作办学选择动因研究 ---推拉理论的拓展与延伸[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):108.
 LI Xiang-ming SUN Chunliu DONG Yuhan.Chinese Students’ Choice in Transnational Higher Education at the Postgraduate Level:Expanding the Push-Pull Factor Theory[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):108.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-20