|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周文辉 贺随波.世界一流大学的“理性神话”及其形成机制[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(01):65-71.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.006507]
 ZHOU Wen-hui HE Sui-bo.World-class University:Rationalized Myth and How It Forms[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(01):65-71.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.006507]
点击复制

世界一流大学的“理性神话”及其形成机制
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
65-71
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2019-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
World-class University:Rationalized Myth and How It Forms
作者:
周文辉 贺随波
学位与研究生教育杂志社
Author(s):
ZHOU Wen-hui HE Sui-bo
Academic Degree & Graduate Education
关键词:
世界一流大学 理性神话 合法性组织分析的新制度主义
Keywords:
world-class university rationalized myth legitimacy the new institutionalism in organizational analysis
分类号:
G649.21
DOI:
10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.006507
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
世界一流大学的作用不仅仅体现在人才培养、科学研究、社会服务等大学职能方面,更体现在它的符号意义,它像“理性神话”一样影响着其他大学组织,甚至是政府的行为。本文认为世界一流大学发挥“理性神话”的方式是合法性机制。具体而言,世界大学排名的兴起,并日益受到重视,界定了何为世界一流大学,同时强化了世界一流大学的社会认知合法性;研究型大学的垄断地位构建了世界一流大学的规范合法性;各国兴起的“世界一流大学运动”赋予了世界一流大学以政治合法性,并逐渐形成文化—认知层面的合法性;世界一流大学的制度扩散一方面传播并强化其规范合法性,另一方面也提高了其社会认知合法性,这又与那些有留学背景的学者和大学管理者直接相关。
Abstract:
What a world-class university can do is not only embodied in teaching, research and service, but also in its significance of being a symbol of a rationalized myth, which may affect the actions of other higher education institutions and even governments. This paper holds that the way of the world first-class universities to play “rationalized myth” is the legitimacy mechanism. Firstly, the world university rankings define what is a world-class university to some extent, which strengthens the social cognitive legitimacy of world-class universities. Secondly, research universities in the monopoly position?construct the normative legitimacy of world-class universities. Thirdly, world-class university movement confers world-class universities political legitimacy, and gradually constructs the cultural cognitive legitimacy of world-class universities. Finally, because of scholars and university administrators with overseas studying or working experience, institutional diffusion of world-class universities spreads and strengthens the normative legitimacy of world-class universities at one hand, and boost its social cognitive legitimacy on the other.

相似文献/References:

[1]张惠 刘宝存.法国建设世界一流大学的战略及实践——以巴黎-萨克雷大学为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):23.
[2]李军.中国大学3.0模式——传统、现代与前瞻[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(04):24.
[3]崔乃文.知识演变与组织创新:世界一流大学的生成机制分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(05):98.
 CUI Nai-wen.Knowledge Evolution and Organization Innovation: the Formation Mechanism of World-class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):98.
[4]张淑林崔育宝李金龙裴旭.大学排名视角下的我国“世界一流大学”建设现状、差距与路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):24.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.002411]
 ZHANG Shu-linCUI Yu-baoLI Jin-longPEI Xu.Status, Disparities and Path of “World-class University”Construction in China Based on University Rankings[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):24.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.002411]
[5]孙百才 徐 宁.香港建设“世界一流大学”的质量保障措施与政策经验[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):75.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.007509]
 SUN Bai-caiXU Ning.Hong Kong’s Quality Assurance Measures and PolicyExperience of Building “World-class Universities”[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):75.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.007509]
[6]孙海涛.新时代建设世界一流大学的挑战[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(04):105.
 SUN Hai-tao.The Challenges of Building a World - class University in the New Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):105.
[7]王战军 刘 静.构建中国特色评价体系 推进世界一流大学建设[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(06):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
 WANG Zhan-jun LIU Jing.Constructing an Evaluation System with Chinese Characteristics and Promoting the Construction of World-class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-20