[1]蔡连玉 李海霏.我国高校内部治理的制度变迁(1949-2018):基于历史制度主义的分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(02):99-106. CAI Lian-yu LI Hai-fei.Institutional Change of University Internal Governance in China (1949-2018): An Analysis from the Historical Institutionalism Perspective[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(02):99-106.
Based on the framework of historical institutionalism, this study finds that the institutional change of university internal governance in China follows a mixed model that combines the characteristics of four institutional change models, i.e. the ‘Punctuated Equilibrium’, “Critical Juncture’, ‘Path-dependent’ and ‘Gradual Transforming’. The political, economic and cultural factors directly or indirectly influenced the institutional change through the national governance paradigm. With a deep reflection on the performance of institutional change in the past 70 years, this study find that the innovation and improvement of university internal governance institution need a reasonable tension between the political identity and academy, and that universities should carry out scientific performance evaluation and get out of ‘Danwei’ system. The collective and effective governance based on law and university charters is the ideal form of institutional innovation.
相似文献/References:
[1]康宁,张其龙,苏慧斌.“ 985工程”转型与“双一流方案”诞生的历史逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(05):11. [2]李 奇.美国高校年度报告的制度变迁[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(03):53. LI Qi.Institutional?Changes?in?the?Annual?Report?of?U.S.?Higher?Education?Institutions[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(02):53.