[1]凯瑟琳·埃尔金.论艺术教育的意义与价值[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(01):1-11.
Catherine Z.Elgin.Art and Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(01):1-11.
点击复制
论艺术教育的意义与价值
Catherine Z.Elgin.Art and Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(01):1-11.
清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]
- 卷:
- 期数:
- 2022年01期
- 页码:
- 1-11
- 栏目:
- OA栏目
- 出版日期:
- 2022-02-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Art and Education
- Keywords:
- art; education; curriculum; inspiration; sensory responses; emotional responses
- 分类号:
- G40-014
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 社会上存在很多对艺术教育的迷思，比如,艺术与教育的关系是什么？艺术是否可教？艺术完全是灵感的产物吗？艺术是否值得被教？艺术教育的作用是什么？符号理论可以表明艺术教育的可行性及价值。我们不应该将艺术仅仅视为达成某一具体目的的手段，而应该将其既看作目的，又视为手段。艺术完全是灵感的产物这一假设是没有根据的，学生的感觉回应和情感反应可以被教育，艺术教育是可能的，也是有价值的。
- Abstract:
- What is the relationship between art and education? There are many myths about art education in society, such as whether art can be taught? Is art worth being taught? What is the role of art education? The symbol theory of art can show the feasibility and value of art education. We should not treat art only as means to achieve some specific purpose but regard them as both means and end. Understanding the work of art is valuable. It also provides a platform for further understanding of art and other things. The end becomes a means to formulating and pursuing further ends, both in the arts and elsewhere. Education for the arts facilitates this process.
相似文献/References:
[1]王建华.论人类的教育[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):27.
[2]杨悦.教育为国家建设服务———1950年高教界关于“理论与实际一致”的争论[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):76.
[3]王孙禺梁竞文.多学科视角下的工程伦理教育[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):9.
WANG sun-yu LIANG jing-wen.Engineering Ethics Education in a Multidisciplinary Perspective[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):9.
[4]马健生 邹 维.论学校及其功能[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(04):23.
MA Jian-sheng ZOU Wei.On?School?and?Its?Functions[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(01):23.
[5]金紫薇 邓友超.中国教育的流动逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(02):30.
JIN Zi-wei DENG You-chao.The Mobile Logic of Chinese Education in the New Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(01):30.
更新日期/Last Update:
2022-02-20