|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李奇.我国高校质量年度报告的制度分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(04):99-104.
　LI Qi.The?Annual?Institutional?Quality?Reporting?System?in?China?’?s?Higher?Education:?An?Institutional?Analysis[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(04):99-104.
点击复制

我国高校质量年度报告的制度分析
分享到：

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
99-104
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2018-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The?Annual?Institutional?Quality?Reporting?System?in?China?’?s?Higher?Education:?An?Institutional?Analysis
作者:
李奇
北京师范大学 教育学部
Author(s):
LI Qi
Faculty of Education , Beijing Normal University
关键词:
质量报告; 信息公开; 透明; 制度分析
Keywords:
quality report;  information disclosure;  transparency;  institutional analysis
分类号:
G649.22
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国高校质量年度报告发布制度由三级报告组成，包含规制、规范和文化认知三个结构。目前，制度的框架已经形成，但在功能性、互补性、可比性以及数据和报告的可获得性方面还存在一定的模糊性。过去几年，高校质量年度报告已逐渐成为高校系统与环境之间反馈圈的一部分，是系统输出对环境输入的回应，作为系统输出正当性的证明。
Abstract:
The annual institutional quality reporting system in China’s higher education is a three-tiered system comprising regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive structures. Currently, the framework of this system has taken shape while ambiguity still remains in its functionality, complementarity, and data/report accessibility. Over the past few years, this reporting system has become a part of the feedback loop operating between the environment and system, serving as a response of the system to the environment-generated supports and demands, with the purpose of justifying the legitimacy of the system’ outputs for the input from the environment.

相似文献/References:

[1]王顶明 刘 华.我国研究生招生中本科生推荐工作透明度与合规性分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(04):75.
　WANG Ding-ming LIU Hua.An?Analysis?of?the?Transparency?and?Legitimacy?ofUndergraduate?Recommendation?in?Graduate?School?Admission?inChina[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):75.
[2]李 奇.美国高校年度报告的制度变迁[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(03):53.
　LI Qi.Institutional?Changes?in?the?Annual?Report?of?U.S.?Higher?Education?Institutions[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(04):53.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-08-20