[1]胡莉芳 王洪成.学科交叉:社会科学与自然科学的互动[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(06):100-109.
HU Li-fang WANG Hong-cheng.Interdisciplinarity: Interaction between Social Science and Natural Science[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(06):100-109.
点击复制
学科交叉:社会科学与自然科学的互动
HU Li-fang WANG Hong-cheng.Interdisciplinarity: Interaction between Social Science and Natural Science[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(06):100-109.
清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]
- 卷:
- 期数:
- 2024年06期
- 页码:
- 100-109
- 栏目:
- 教育思想与理论
- 出版日期:
- 2024-12-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Interdisciplinarity: Interaction between Social Science and Natural Science
- Keywords:
- interdisciplinarity; social science; natural science; talent cultivation; discipline localization
- 分类号:
- G40-05
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 19世纪以来,围绕社会科学与自然科学的互动,以社会科学的诞生、发展、新进展为线索,学科交叉呈现出显著的阶段性特点。分科后学科间的“借鉴”不同于古典知识的统合性,知识在新的起点上进行交叉,从活跃期到自觉期,学科交叉跨越边界指向社会需求和知识生产,创新是贯彻始终的基本内涵。交叉打破知识的有序状态,经历不确定阶段以后成熟的交叉学科又建构起新的有序状态,知识在“稳定—不稳定—稳定”的循环中实现了创新,学科交叉成为创新的“引擎”。历史经验表明,学科交叉在知识供需的矛盾中发展,对接大学人才培养转型和学科本土化而面向未来。
- Abstract:
- Since the 19th century, the historical evolution of interdisciplinary research has shown significant stage characteristics, with social science’s birth, development, and new progress as the main clues, revolving around the interaction between natural science and social science. The “reference” between disciplines after division differed from classical knowledge’s comprehensiveness. When knowledge crosses at a new starting point, and after going through the active and conscious periods, interdisciplinarity crosses boundaries and points to social needs and knowledge production. Innovation is the basic connotation that runs through it all. Interdisciplinary activities break the orderly state of knowledge, and after experiencing an uncertain stage, mature interdisciplinary disciplines create a new orderly state. Knowledge achieves innovation in a cycle of “stability - instability - stability,” and interdisciplinary becomes the “engine” of innovation. Based on the above changes in the state of knowledge, interdisciplinarity develops in the contradiction between knowledge supply and demand, which are oriented towards the future through the transformation of university talent cultivation and the localization of disciplines.
相似文献/References:
[1]李颍,董超,李正风,等.美英社会科学评价的经验与启示[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(05):13.
[2]邢欢.社会科学研究：非学术影响及其评估[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):66.
[3]张 羽.驻校教育研究范式初探[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(03):66.
ZHANG Yu.Preliminary Discussion on the Paradigm of Resident Educational Research[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(06):66.
[4]谢 梦.社会科学知识体系的重塑：走出知识危机与不平等的国际学术关系[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(03):102.
XIE Meng.Restructuring the Social Sciences: Beyond Knowledge Crisis and Asymmetrical International Academic Relations[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(06):102.
[5]杨丽萍 辛 涛 陈惠英.大科学时代高等教育人才培养目标的反思与重构[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(05):136.
YANG Li-ping XIN Tao CHEN Hui-ying.Reflection and Reconstruction of Talent Cultivation Objectives in Higher Education in the Big Science Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(06):136.
[6]马永红 杜鹏程.跨域耦合和知识界面重构：高校主持国家重大科技攻关项目中协同创新路径研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(02):104.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.010410]
MA Yong-hong DU Peng-cheng.Cross-Domain Coupling and Knowledge Interface Reconstruction: A Study on Collaborative Innovation Pathways in University-Led National Major Science and Technology Projects[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(06):104.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.010410]