[1]刘 莉 朱 莉 刘念才.目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究
——基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):73-82.
LIU Li ZHU Li LIU Nian-cai.A Study on the Recognition of Evaluation Policy for Researchers in Chinese Universities from the Perspective of Target Groups——Based on the Questionnaire of 20“Double World-Class”Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(02):73-82.
点击复制
目标群体视角下高校教师科研评价政策认同研究
——基于20所“双一流”建设高校的问卷调查
LIU Li ZHU Li LIU Nian-cai.A Study on the Recognition of Evaluation Policy for Researchers in Chinese Universities from the Perspective of Target Groups——Based on the Questionnaire of 20“Double World-Class”Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(02):73-82.
清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]
- 卷:
- 期数:
- 2020年02期
- 页码:
- 73-82
- 栏目:
- 教育改革与发展
- 出版日期:
- 2020-04-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- A Study on the Recognition of Evaluation Policy for Researchers in Chinese Universities from the Perspective of Target Groups——Based on the Questionnaire of 20“Double World-Class”Universities
- Keywords:
- target group; researchers; evaluation policy; policy recognition; “Double World-Class”Initiative
- 分类号:
- G644
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 提升科研水平是“双一流”建设的五大任务之一，科研评价在推动高校创新转型中具有重要的导向作用。因此，在“双一流”建设过程中，高校教师科研评价政策改革尤为重要。目标群体对政策的认同程度直接影响政策目标的实现程度。选择20所“双一流”建设高校开展问卷调查，从目标群体的视角探究高校教师科研评价政策的认同程度及其影响因素。调查结果显示：高校教师对科研评价政策内容的认同程度普遍较高，对科研评价政策执行的认同程度普遍较低；科研评价政策的内容认同与执行认同程度之间存在较大差异，学科领域之间的差异不明显；政策的稳定性及其内容的合理性、政策在高校与院系的执行情况、教师在学术发展方面的获益情况及其在政策过程中的参与程度是影响认同程度的主要因素。
- Abstract:
- Improving research capacity is one of the tasks of the“Double World-Class”Initiative.Research evaluation plays an important guiding role in promoting innovation and transformation of universities.Therefore，the reform of the evaluation policy of university researchers is particularly important in the process of“Double World-Class”construction.The degree of policy recognition in the target group affects the degree of realization of policy objectives.This study measures the target group's policy recognition with a questionnaire of 20selected“Double World-Class”universities.The results show that researchers generally have a higher degree of recognition with the content of evaluation policies and a relatively low degree of recognition with policy implementation，there is a large difference between the recognition of policy content and policy implementation，but the dispersion across disciplines is not significant.The key factors influencing the policy recognition mainly include the stability and rationality of policy content，policy implementation in the university and departments，faculty's benefits in academic development and their participation in the policy making process.
相似文献/References:
[1]金明珠 樊富珉.高校新教师职业发展初探：职业适应与职业认同研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):113.
JIN Ming-zhu FAN Fu-min.Work Adaptation and Professional Identity of University New Faculty：
A Preliminary Study of Professional Development[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(02):113.
[2]刘智慧 李志峰 高 慧.房间里的大象:高校教师劳动关系冲突类型及纾解机制[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(04):55.
LIU Zhi-hui LI Zhi-feng GAO Hui.The Elephant in the Room: The Types of Labor Relations Conflicts of University Teachers and Its Relief Mechanisms[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(02):55.
[3]沈敬轩 朱施蓉 蒋凯.学术职业的分化与分层：高校教师教学科研产出群体差异的实证研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(04):153.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.015313]
SHEN Jing-xuan ZHU Shi-rong JIANG Kai.Differentiation and Strati?cation in the Academic Profession:An Empirical Study of Group Differences in Teaching and Research Output among Chinese University Faculty[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(02):153.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.015313]