|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李枭鹰 王名扬 郭新伟.研究生课程衔接的现实困境、深层障碍与范式重构[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(04):175-183.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.017509]
 LI Xiao-ying WANG Ming-yang GUO Xin-wei.Practical Dilemmas, Deep-Seated Barriers, and Paradigm Reconstruction in Postgraduate Curriculum Articulation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(04):175-183.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.017509]
点击复制

研究生课程衔接的现实困境、深层障碍与范式重构
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2026年04期
页码:
175-183
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2026-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Practical Dilemmas, Deep-Seated Barriers, and Paradigm Reconstruction in Postgraduate Curriculum Articulation
作者:
李枭鹰1 王名扬1 郭新伟2
1.北京外国语大学 教育学院;2. 大连理工大学 高等教育研究院
Author(s):
LI Xiao-ying1 WANG Ming-yang1 GUO Xin-wei2
1. School of Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University; 2. Institute of Higher Education, Dalian University of Technology
关键词:
研究生教育课程衔接现实困境深层障碍范式重构
Keywords:
postgraduate student education curriculum articulation practical dilemmas deep-seated barriers paradigm reconstruction
分类号:
G643
DOI:
10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.017509
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
课程衔接既是课程体系建设的根基,也是推动课程教学高质量发展的支柱,更是优化课程秩序的抓手。当前,我国研究生课程衔接的现实困境集中体现为纵向时序性衔接不连贯、横向融合性衔接不到位、深度认知性衔接不充分以及主体适应性衔接乏力,具体表现为课程结构去中心化、课程功能边缘化、课程资源孤岛化、课程时序错位化、课程评价内卷化,导致整个课程体系与研究生的发展需求难以形成正向适配。而这背后,又隐藏着研究生课程衔接面临的四大深层障碍:学科知识逻辑与科研问题逻辑协同难,刚性课程体系与弹性研究路径匹配难,导师深度指导与课程广度教学整合难,评估存量导向与增量导向平衡难。应立足研究生课程的特殊使命,围绕课程体系与个性化研究的正向适配,开展一场以学术创新为核心的范式重构,实现体系性支撑与个性化发展的辩证统一。
Abstract:
Curriculum articulation is not only the foundation for constructing a curriculum system, and the pillar for promoting the high-quality development of teaching, but also a key mechanism for optimizing curriculum order. Currently, the practical dilemmas of postgraduate curriculum articulation in China are primarily re?ected in incoherent vertical sequential articulation, inadequate horizontal integrative articulation,insuf?cient in-depth cognitive articulation, and weak subject-level adaptive articulation. These are speci?cally manifested as decentralized curriculum structures, marginalized curriculum functions, isolated curriculum resources, misaligned curriculum sequencing, and involution in curriculum evaluation. Consequently, it is dif?cult for the overall curriculum system to positively align with the developmental needs of postgraduates.Underlying these dilemmas are four deep-seated barriers to postgraduate curriculum articulation: dif?culties in coordinating the logic of disciplinary knowledge with that of research problems, matching rigid curriculum systems with flexible research pathways, integrating in-depth supervisor guidance with broad curriculum teaching, and balancing baseline-oriented and growth-oriented evaluation. We must base ourselves on the special mission of postgraduate courses, focus on the positive alignment between the curriculum system and individualized research and carry out a paradigm reconstruction with academic innovation at its core, so as to realize the dialectical unity of systematic support and individualized development.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈露茜.对美国研究生入学考试(GRE)的历史研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(01):102.
[2]蒋林浩,沈文钦.美国高校博士点项目内部评估——以俄亥俄州立大学为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(03):40.
[3]胡莉芳.美国专业学位研究生教育结构及其发展趋势研究(1971-2012年)[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(03):48.
[4]方超,罗英姿.人力资本梯度升级视野下的我国研究生教育供给侧改革[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(05):68.
[5]李立国 杜 帆.中国研究生教育对经济增长的贡献率分析——基于1996-2016年省际面板数据的实证研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(02):56.
 LI Li-guo DU Fan.The Impact of Postgraduate Education on Economic Growth in China: An Empirical Analysis on a Provincial Panel Data from 1996 to 2016[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(04):56.
[6]李明磊 王战军.改革开放以来中国研究生教育管理:成就与挑战[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(05):105.
 LI Ming-lei WANG Zhan-jun.Postgraduate?Education?Management?in?China?since?theReform?and?Opening?up:?Achievements?and?Challenges[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(04):105.
[7]李锋亮 王瑜琪.我国研究生教育经济学研究发展回顾——基于1998-2019年CSSCI源刊文献的可视化分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(06):92.
 LI Feng-liang WANG Yu-qi.Retrospect?of?Development?in?Economics?of?GraduateEducation?in?China:?Based?on?the?Visualized?Analysisof?the?CSSCI?Source?Journals?from?1998?to?2019[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(04):92.
[8]马永红 刘润泽.研究生教育的本质和发展逻辑探究[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(03):42.
 MA Yong-hong LIU Run-ze.The Nature and Development Logic of Graduate Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):42.
[9]李立国 杜 帆.我国研究生教育对区域创新的溢出效应研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(04):40.
 LI Li-guo DU Fan.Analysis on the Spillover Effect of Chinese Postgraduate Education on the Regional Innovation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(04):40.
[10]马永红 张飞龙 刘润泽.广义科教融合:研究生教育的本质回归及实现路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(04):60.
 MA Yong-hong ZHANG Fei-long LIU Run-ze.Generalized Integration of Science and Education: The Return of the Essence of Graduate Education and its Realization Path[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(04):60.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-08-20