«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:

期数:

2026年04期

页码:

118-128

栏目:

教育思想与理论

出版日期:

2026-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Rethinking Measurism in University Evaluation from the Perspective of a Singular Society

作者:

张庆玲

扬州大学 教育学院

Author(s):

ZHANG Qing-ling

College of Education, Yangzhou University

关键词:

大学评价; 测量主义; 普适性; 独异性; 人文主义评价

Keywords:

university evaluation;  measurism;  universality;  singularity;  humanistic evaluation

分类号:

G647

DOI:

10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.011811

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

现代社会中，普适性逻辑和独异性逻辑在互相竞争。长期以来，在普适性逻辑支配下，现代大学评价中的“测量主义”呈现了高效率、可计算性、可预测性和控制四个基本面相。晚现代社会中的教育评价既保存了普适性社会对“量化理想”的基本要求，又制造出了“独异性量化”的新模式，评价理念从标准化生产转向“制造创新”，评价标准从绩效思维升级到“自我实现”的成功叙事，评价逻辑从量化的逻辑转向策展式的表演性逻辑，评价对象从简单数据比较转移到质性量化赋值。究其根本，独异性社会的评价运行在一种“持续评价”模式之上，绩效思维与成功经济的双重评价标准加剧了测量主义的复杂化；独异化的创意经济对创新的模式化导致了测量主义的泛化；自我实现的单一成功评价模式加剧了测量主义的质性转化；自我优化思维强化了测量主义对主体性的物化。为超越测量主义的评价困境，现代教育需要摆脱自我实现的价值规训，从“强评价”走向弱评价；走出“测量主义”的迷思，构建人文主义的评价范式；跳出“赢者通吃”式的竞争性个人主义评估，回归“关系型评估”，以欣赏取向尊重不同主体的理性之光。

Abstract:

In modern society, universal logic and singular logic compete with each other. For a long time,under the domination of universalistic logic, measurism in modern university evaluation has embodied four fundamental dimensions: high efficiency, computability, predictability, and controllability. In late modern society, educational evaluation not only retains the basic requirements of the universalistic society for the quantitative ideal, but also generates a new model of singular quantification. The evaluation paradigm has shifted from standardized production to fostering innovation; the evaluation criteria have upgraded from performance-oriented thinking to a success narrative of self-realization; the evaluation logic has transformed from pure quantitative logic to curatorial and performative logic; and the evaluation objective has shifted from simple data comparison to quantifying qualitative evaluations. Fundamentally, evaluation in a singular society operates under a perpetual evaluation mechanism. The dual evaluation yardsticks of performance thinking and success economy aggravate the progressive complication of measurism; the templating and routinization of innovation within the singular creative economy leads to the pervasion of measurism; the unitary success evaluation model centered on self-realization intensifies the qualitative transformation of measurism; selfoptimization thinking strengthens the objecti?cation of subjectivity brought by measurism. To transcend the evaluative predicament caused by measurism, modern education must break free from the value discipline of self-realization and shift from strong evaluation to weak evaluation; dispel the myth of measurism and construct a humanistic evaluation paradigm; abandon the winner-takes-all competitive individualistic evaluation model and embrace relationship-based evaluation, so as to respect the rational wisdom of diverse subjects from an appreciation-oriented perspective.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-08-20