|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张学文.大科学时代大学理性的理论体系重构与治理统摄引领[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(04):52-67.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.005216]
 ZHANG Xue-wen.Reconstruction of the Theoretical System of Rationality and Governance-Led Guidance in China’s Universities in the Era of Big Science[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(04):52-67.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.005216]
点击复制

大科学时代大学理性的理论体系重构与治理统摄引领
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2026年04期
页码:
52-67
栏目:
学术前沿
出版日期:
2026-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reconstruction of the Theoretical System of Rationality and Governance-Led Guidance in China’s Universities in the Era of Big Science
作者:
张学文
深圳大学 教育学部
Author(s):
ZHANG Xue-wen
Faculty of Education, Shenzhen University
关键词:
大科学时代大学理性理论体系重构治理统摄引领
Keywords:
the era of Big Science university rationality theoretical system reconstruction governance-led guidance
分类号:
G649.21
DOI:
10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.005216
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
大科学时代知识生产的跨学科协同、国家创新驱动发展战略、高等教育内涵式发展及东西方理性文化根基,共同构成中国大学理性体系重构与治理现代化的基本语境。本文基于东西方理性文化差异视角,梳理大学理性的基本内涵与演进脉络,构建出“三级结构”与“五维支撑体系”,明确其对大学治理的统摄引领维度与协同路径。研究表明,大学理性是大学的本质精神内核,二者同源共生、双向赋能;大科学时代大学理性需转向个体理性与集体理性的协同形态,其对大学治理的统摄引领实现了系统性升级。从高等教育哲学本质来看,重构后的大学理性及其理论体系对大学治理的统摄引领作用是内在的、根本的,从根源上解决了长期以来大学治理中存在的价值偏差、逻辑混乱、效能不高等诸多问题,让大学治理从被动应对变化,转变为主动引领自身发展,为我国大学治理现代化与高等教育强国建设提供扎实的理论与实践支撑。
Abstract:
The interdisciplinary collaboration of knowledge production in the era of Big Science, the implementation of the national innovation-driven development strategy, the demand for the high-quality development of higher education, and the differences between Eastern and Western rational cultures collectively form the fundamental context for reconstructing the system of university rationality and modernizing university governance in China. From the perspective of cultural differences in rationality between the East and the West,this paper reviews the basic connotations and evolutionary trajectories of university rationality, constructs its “three-level structure” and “?ve-dimensional support system,” and clari?es its dimensions of overarching guidance and collaborative paths for university governance. Findings reveal that university rationality constitutes the essential spiritual core of universities; the two share a common origin, coexist symbiotically,and mutually empower each other. In the era of Big Science, university rationality must shift toward a synergy of individual and collective rationality, achieving a systemic upgrade in its overarching guidance for university governance. From the perspective of the philosophical essence of higher education, the reconstructed university rationality and its theoretical system provide intrinsic and fundamental overarching guidance for university governance. This fundamentally resolves long-standing issues such as value deviation, logical confusion, and low ef?ciency, transforming university governance from passively responding to changes to proactively leading its own development. Ultimately, it offers solid theoretical and practical support for the modernization of university governance and the building of a higher education powerhouse in China.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨光钦.高校学术生产数量繁荣的制度探源及理性分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(05):60.
[2]叶 隽.人格单元的“拟塑”与观念侨易的“仿交”之道 ——以“大学理性”为中心的考察[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):105.
 YE Jun.The“Imitation”of Personality Unit and the Tao of“Fangjiao”in Qiaoyi of Concepts——An Investigation Centered on“University Rationality”[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):105.
[3]杨丽萍 辛 涛 陈惠英.大科学时代高等教育人才培养目标的反思与重构[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(05):136.
 YANG Li-ping XIN Tao CHEN Hui-ying.Reflection and Reconstruction of Talent Cultivation Objectives in Higher Education in the Big Science Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(04):136.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-08-20