[1]黄福涛.亚洲高等教育研究的知识生产模式与发展逻辑
——基于中国、日本与马来西亚的比较分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(04):20-30.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.002011]
HUANG Fu-tao.Knowledge Production and Development Logic of Higher Education Research in Asia:A Comparative Study of China,Japan, and Malaysia[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(04):20-30.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.002011]
点击复制
亚洲高等教育研究的知识生产模式与发展逻辑
——基于中国、日本与马来西亚的比较分析
HUANG Fu-tao.Knowledge Production and Development Logic of Higher Education Research in Asia:A Comparative Study of China,Japan, and Malaysia[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(04):20-30.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.04.002011]
清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]
- 卷:
- 期数:
- 2026年04期
- 页码:
- 20-30
- 栏目:
- 高等教育研究
- 出版日期:
- 2026-08-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Knowledge Production and Development Logic of Higher Education Research in Asia:A Comparative Study of China,Japan, and Malaysia
- Keywords:
- higher education research in Asia; knowledge production; research-policy nexus; embedded knowledge production; comparative study
- 分类号:
- G649.3
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 在全球高等教育体系持续重构的背景下，亚洲逐渐由“追赶者”转变为重要参与者，高等教育研究的功能与定位亦随之发生转型。本文基于比较视角，选取中国、日本与马来西亚为分析对象，从制度基础、研究取向、研究－政策关系与全球嵌入性四个维度，系统探讨亚洲高等教育研究的知识生产模式及其发展逻辑。研究发现，亚洲高等教育研究整体呈现出较强的政策导向与实践导向，其制度基础表现为国家嵌入与学术组织化并存，不同国家形成了“政策嵌入型”“学术主导型”与“桥梁型”等差异化发展模式。同时，在全球知识体系中，亚洲高等教育研究仍面临“高政策相关性－相对弱理论建构能力”的结构性不平衡。基于此，本文提出“嵌入式知识生产”的分析视角，强调高等教育研究作为一种嵌入于国家制度、政策体系与全球知识结构中的多层互动过程，其发展路径取决于制度嵌入性、政策关联性与学术自主性之间的动态配置。研究认为，推动亚洲高等教育研究由经验导向向理论导向转型，是提升其国际学术影响力与理论贡献能力的关键路径。
- Abstract:
- In the context of the ongoing restructuring of the global higher education system, Asia has gradually shifted from a “follower” to an increasingly important actor, accompanied by a transformation in the role and function of higher education research. Drawing on a comparative perspective, this study examines China, Japan, and Malaysia to explore the knowledge production patterns and development logic of higher education research in Asia across four dimensions: institutional foundations, research orientations, the research-policy nexus, and global embeddedness. The ?ndings indicate that higher education research in Asia is characterized by strong policy and practice orientations, with varying degrees of institutional embeddedness in state structures alongside academic institutionalization. Distinct national patterns can be identi?ed, including policy-embedded, academically driven, and bridging models. At the same time, within the global knowledge system, higher education research in Asia remains constrained by a structural imbalance between high policy relevance and relatively limited theoretical development. To address this issue, the study proposes the concept of “embedded knowledge production,” emphasizing that higher education research operates as a multilayered process embedded in national institutions, policy frameworks, and global knowledge structures. Its development trajectory is shaped by the dynamic interplay among institutional embeddedness, policy relevance,and academic autonomy. The study argues that a critical pathway for enhancing Asia’s global academic in?uence lies in shifting from an experience-oriented approach toward stronger theory-building grounded in local contexts.
更新日期/Last Update:
2026-08-20