|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]马永红 杜鹏程.跨域耦合和知识界面重构:高校主持国家重大科技攻关项目中协同创新路径研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(02):104-114.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.010410]
 MA Yong-hong DU Peng-cheng.Cross-Domain Coupling and Knowledge Interface Reconstruction: A Study on Collaborative Innovation Pathways in University-Led National Major Science and Technology Projects[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(02):104-114.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.010410]
点击复制

跨域耦合和知识界面重构:高校主持国家重大科技攻关项目中协同创新路径研究
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2026年02期
页码:
104-114
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2026-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Cross-Domain Coupling and Knowledge Interface Reconstruction: A Study on Collaborative Innovation Pathways in University-Led National Major Science and Technology Projects
作者:
马永红1 2 杜鹏程1 3
1.北京航空航天大学 人文社会科学学院(公共管理学院);2.北京市哲学社会科学研究生教育改革与发展研究基地;3.杭州市北京航空航天大学国际创新研究院(北京航空航天大学国际创新学院)
Author(s):
MA Yong-hong1 2 DU Peng-cheng1 3
1. School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Beihang University;2. Beijing Philosophy and Social Science Research Base for Graduate Education Reform and Development;3. Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University
关键词:
国家重大科技攻关跨学科学科交叉协同创新路径
Keywords:
national major science and technology projects disciplinary integration interdisciplinaritycollaborative innovation pathway
分类号:
G644
DOI:
10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.010410
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
高校主持国家重大科技攻关项目是高校有组织科研的重要实践,协同创新是解决跨学科问题的关键路径。本文以某“双一流”高校主持的6个国家重大科技攻关项目为研究对象,采用质性研究方法基于协同理论和三螺旋创新理论的分析框架系统探讨了协同创新的机制与路径。研究表明,跨域耦合和知识界面重构是协同创新的关键路径,有助于解决复杂的跨学科问题,推动科研团队在技术创新和理论发展上的突破,并构建了从理论创新、技术研发到产业应用的闭环。研究发现,跨学科接口作为资源和知识整合的关键节点,实现了学科间的高效协作;多层次的虚实合作网络有效整合了校内外资源,形成了以高校为核心的大学术共同体,推动了项目协同创新。同时,科技攻关项目需综合考量经济、社会、环境等多维因素,推动技术、市场与社会的深度融合。首席科学家在项目战略引领和资源整合中发挥了核心作用,博士生在跨学科协同中发挥了知识桥梁和媒介作用,推动了学科间的深度融合。高校通过文化建设、跨学院兼职、绩效考核改革等机制为跨学科协作提供了保障。本文提出了强化交叉平台建设、优化资源配置、开展跨域人才培养、促进产学研用协同的政策建议。
Abstract:
University-led national major science and technology projects constitute a crucial practice of organized research in Chinese universities, and collaborative innovation serves as a key pathway to addressing transdisciplinary problems. This study examines six national major science and technology projects led by a “Double First-Class” university. Adopting a qualitative research approach, it systematically explores the mechanisms and pathways of collaborative innovation, drawing on the analytical frameworks of synergetic theory and the Triple Helix innovation model. The ?ndings indicate that cross-domain coupling and knowledge interface reconstruction are the key pathways for collaborative innovation, helping resolve complex transdisciplinary problems, facilitating breakthroughs in both technological innovation and theoretical advancement, and establishing a closed-loop system from theoretical innovation and technological development to industrial application. The study reveals that interdisciplinary interfaces serve as crucial nodes for integrating resources and knowledge, enabling ef?cient collaboration across disciplines. Moreover, a multi-level hybrid collaboration network effectively integrates internal and external resources, forming a university-centered academic community that fosters project-based collaborative innovation. Furthermore, these national major science and technology projects are supposed to comprehensively consider economic, social, and environmental factors to promote the deep integration of technology, market, and society. The study highlights the pivotal role of principal scientists in strategic leadership and resource integration, while doctoral students function as knowledge bridges and mediators in interdisciplinary collaboration, facilitating deep integration among disciplines. Universities support interdisciplinary collaboration through cultural development, cross-school dual appointments, and performance evaluation reforms. Based on these insights, this study proposes policy recommendations to enhance the construction of interdisciplinary platforms, optimize resource allocation,promote cross-domain talent cultivation, and foster industry-university-research collaboration.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴 伟 徐贤春 樊晓杰 陈艾华.学科会聚引领世界一流大学建设的路径探讨[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(05):80.
 Wu Wei Xu Xian-chun Fan Xiao-jie Chen Ai-hua.Discussions on the Path of Leading the Construction of World-class Universities by Discipline Convergence[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(02):80.
[2]徐立辉 王孙禺.跨学科合作的工科人才培养新模式 ——工程教育的探索性多案例研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(05):107.
 XU Li-hui WANG Sun-yu.New Mode of Engineering Talents Training Based on Interdisciplinary Cooperation: An Exploratory Multi-Case Study of Engineering Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(02):107.
[3]谢 梦 童颖之.跨学科与博士生培养:美国顶尖研究型大学社科类人才培养研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(01):96.
 XIE Meng TONG Ying-zhi.Interdisciplinary Doctoral Education: Research on Talents Cultivation in the Social Sciences of American Research Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(02):96.
[4]马永红 张晓会.跨学科的内涵、机理及衍变路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(01):30.
 MA Yong-hong ZHANG Xiao-hui.The Connotation, Mechanism and Derivation Path of Interdisciplinarity[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(02):30.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-20