|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨欣.教育数字化的算法向度[J].清华大学教育研究,2026,(02):85-93.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.008508]
 YANG Xin.The Algorithmic Dimension of Educational Digitization[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2026,(02):85-93.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.008508]
点击复制

教育数字化的算法向度
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2026年02期
页码:
85-93
栏目:
教育思想与理论
出版日期:
2026-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Algorithmic Dimension of Educational Digitization
作者:
杨欣
西南大学 基础教育研究中心
Author(s):
YANG Xin
Basic Education Research Center, Southwest University
关键词:
教育数字化算法价值知识权力
Keywords:
educational digitization algorithm value knowledge power
分类号:
G434
DOI:
10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.02.008508
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
算法作为教育数字化的前提和规则,它不仅可以如“镜子”一般映照出其中的机遇和隐忧,亦可如“楔子”一般引申出教育数字化的进路所在。从算法的视角来看,教育数字化既孕育着彰显个体价值的算法推荐、助力知识跃迁的算法赋能、导向权力创新的算法决策,也暗含了极化价值孤立的算法圈养、迫使知识失格的算法僭越、加速权力失衡的算法歧视。这既表明了数字化进程中算法之于教育的双重影响力,更指向了教育因为数字化而可能面临的价值困扰、知识压力和权力积弊。鉴于此,未来尤有必要以算法为引促进教育的开放交流、重申教育的人本宗旨和重塑教育的公平内涵,以使之迈向更加安全、稳健且可持续的数字化进路。
Abstract:
As a prerequisite and rule for educational digitization, algorithms not only re?ects opportunities and hidden concerns like a “mirror”, but also elucidates the pathways of educational digitization like a “wedge”.From the perspective of algorithms, educational digitization embodies algorithmic recommendations that highlight individual value, algorithmic empowerment that facilitates knowledge transition, and algorithmic decision-making that drives power innovation, while at the same time implies algorithmic enclosure that polarizes value isolation, algorithmic usurpation that renders knowledge invalid, and algorithmic discrimination that accelerates power imbalance. This demonstrates the dual influence of algorithms on education in the process of digitization, and points to the value dilemma, knowledge pressure, and power accumulation that education may face due to digitization. In view of this, it is particularly necessary to take algorithms as a guide to promote open communication in education, reaf?rm the humanistic purpose of education, and reshape the connotation of education equity in the future, thereby enabling it to move towards a safer, more stable, and sustainable pathway of digitization.

相似文献/References:

[1]周 娜 李 辉.大学教学数字化:离心型与向心型模式比较 ——以澳大利亚麦考瑞大学和丹麦奥伦堡大学为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(03):45.
 ZHOU Na LI Hui.The Centrifugal versus Centripetal Models: A Comparison of the Digitalization of Macquarie University and Aalborg University[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(02):45.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-20