|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]周作宇 岳唤唤.协同治理:大学治理的理想状态与实践路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(06):11-27.
 ZHOU Zuo-yu YUE Huan-huan.Collaborative Governance:The Ideal State and Practical Path of University Governance[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(06):11-27.
点击复制

协同治理:大学治理的理想状态与实践路径
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2025年06期
页码:
11-27
栏目:
OA栏目
出版日期:
2025-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Collaborative Governance:The Ideal State and Practical Path of University Governance
作者:
周作宇 岳唤唤
北京师范大学 教育学部
Author(s):
ZHOU Zuo-yu YUE Huan-huan
Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University
关键词:
大学治理协同治理大学协同治理模型模型建构实践路径
Keywords:
university governance collaborative governance university collaborative governance model model construction practical pathway
分类号:
G647
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
大学治理是国家治理能力与治理体系现代化的重要体现,但在实践中仍面临部门各自为政、多头管理、相互推诿等问题。研究基于对32所高校192位治理人员的访谈文本分析,总结大学组织协同在行政管理、绩效考核、权责利益配置、数字技术应用的现实境遇。基于此,研究进一步反思协同治理理论在我国大学治理应用中的社会情境与组织特性差异,创建了大学协同治理“K-TEAM”模型,提出我国大学协同治理路径,为深入理解大学协同治理运行和优化组织协同提供了理论依据与实践参考。
Abstract:
University governance is an important manifestation of the state’s governance capacity and the modernization of its governance system. In practice, however, it continues to face challenges such as departmental silos, multi-headed management, and mutual shirking of responsibilities. Based on an analysis of interview texts from 192 governance personnel across 32 universities, this study summarizes the realities of organizational collaboration in administrative management, performance evaluation, allocation of powers, responsibilities and interests, and application of digital technologies. Building on these findings, the study further reflects on the differences in social context and organizational characteristics in the application of collaborative governance theory in Chinese universities, constructs the “K-TEAM” model of university collaborative governance, and proposes potential pathways to promote collaborative governance in China. The findings provide both theoretical foundations and practical references for a deeper understanding of the operation of university collaborative governance and the optimization of organizational collaboration.

相似文献/References:

[1]钱颖一.大学治理:美国、欧洲、中国[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(5):1.
[2]徐琪,姜华.大学内部权力结构和决策角色研究 ——基于社会网络分析的视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(01):55.
[3]胡弼成 孙 燕.文化精神:大学内部治理之魂[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(03):24.
[4]别敦荣,菲利普·阿特巴赫.中美大学治理对谈[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(04):36.
[5]周作宇.微观政治:大学治理中的一个特殊场域[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):14.
[6]严蔚刚.我国高校教授委员会的治理关系类型分析 ——基于教育部核准的84所高校章程之规定[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):82.
[7]任增元 李欣欣.坚守本真的大学之道 建设世界一流大学——钱颖一《大学的改革》学习札记[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(04):111.
 REN Zeng-yuan LI Xin-xin.Stick to the True Principle of University Build World - class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(06):111.
[8]陈天昊.法国的大学治理:在“大学自治”与“教师自治”之间[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(02):36.
 CHEN Tian-hao.French University Governance:Between University Autonomy and Teacher Autonomy[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(06):36.
[9]周作宇.大学治理行动:秩序原理与制度执行[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):1.
 ZHOU Zuo-yu.University Governance Actions:Order Principles and Institution Implementation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(06):1.
[10]周作宇.大学治理的文化基础: 价值坐标与行动选择[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(06):1.
 ZHOU Zuo-yu.The Cultural Bases of University Governance: Value Clarification and Action Orientation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(06):1.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-12-20