«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:

期数:

2025年01期

页码:

48-54

栏目:

教育改革与发展

出版日期:

2025-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Towards World-Class Status: An Empirical Analysis of the International Standing of Life Sciences and Medicine Disciplines in China

作者:

林婕¹ 吴娴² 刘念才¹

1.上海交通大学 教育学院;2.苏州工学院 高等教育研究所

Author(s):

LIN Jie¹ WU Xian² LIU Nian-cai¹

1.School of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University;2.Institute of Higher Education, Suzhou University of Technology

关键词:

世界一流学科; 生命医学类学科; 学科评价; 高精尖指标

Keywords:

world-class disciplines;  life sciences and medical disciplines;  discipline evaluation;  key indicators

分类号:

G644

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

在“双一流”建设战略深入推进的新阶段,构建引领一流学科发展的高精尖评价体系,是实现世界一流大学建设目标的关键。本研究通过文献梳理、评价体系分析、指标分类、指标筛选,结合不同类型的专家访谈,构建了面向生命医学类一流学科的评价指标体系。研究选取生物学、基础医学、临床医学等九个生命医学类学科作为对象,基于世界顶尖、世界一流、国内顶尖和国内一流四个层次的分组,深入分析了我国生命医学类一流学科的国际水平。研究发现,我国生命医学类一流学科距离世界一流仍存在明显的差距。

Abstract:

In the new phase of advancing the “Double First-Class” Initiative, developing a cutting-edge evaluation system to guide the progress of world-class disciplines is crucial to achieving the goal of building world-class universities. Through literature review, evaluation system analysis, index classification, index screening, and combined with interviews of different types of experts, this study constructs an evaluation index system for world-class disciplines in life sciences and medicine. The study selects nine life-science and medicine-related disciplines, such as biology, basic medicine, and clinical medicine, as the research objects. Based on the grouping of four levels: world-top, world-class, domestic-top, and domestic-first-class, it deeply analyzes the international standing of first-class disciplines in life sciences and medicine in China. The study finds that there are still obvious gaps between first-class disciplines in life sciences and medicine in China and their world-class counterparts.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-20