|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]苏菲·克拉普斯安妮琳·范德科克霍夫 马丁·平克斯滕 海蒂·克尼普拉特 格蕾特·朗治.未来工程师的专业角色认知[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(03):55-64.
 Sofie Craps Anneleen van de KerkhofMaarten Pinxten Heidi Knipprath Greet Langie.Awareness of Future Engineers’ Professional Roles[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(03):55-64.
点击复制

未来工程师的专业角色认知
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
55-64
栏目:
工程教育
出版日期:
2021-06-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Awareness of Future Engineers’ Professional Roles
作者:
苏菲·克拉普斯1安妮琳·范德科克霍夫2 马丁·平克斯滕1 海蒂·克尼普拉特3 格蕾特·朗治1
1.鲁汶大学 工程与科学教育中心 2.鲁汶大学 工程技术学院 3.比利时佛拉芒大区 政府职业介绍和就业培训中心
Author(s):
Sofie Craps 1 Anneleen van de Kerkhof2Maarten Pinxten1 Heidi Knipprath3 Greet Langie1
1.Faculty of Engineering Technology & Leuven Engineering & Science Education Centre,KU Leuven 2.Faculty of Engineering Technology, KU Leuven 3.Research Institute for Work and Society, KU Leuven
关键词:
工程教育就业能力专业角色工作契合度职业指导
Keywords:
Engineering education employability professional roles job-fit career guidance
分类号:
T-29
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
了解专业的未来对学生的学习和工作满意度有着积极的影响。然而,工科学生往往没有意识到自己想成为什么样的工程师,以及需要什么样的专业能力。为了帮助工科学生更加了解未来的可能性及需求,产业界开发出了一套未来工程师的专业角色模型(Professional Roles Model for Future Engineers)并进行了验证。在不同部门的工程师和人力资源代表的密切配合下,该模型确定了三种专业角色以及相关的能力属性。本研究旨在调查学生们如何看待该模型,以及他们在多大程度上可以识别出自己的专业角色。研究发现:即使在毕业时,学生们仍旧发现很难描述他们的职业抱负;本科生和硕士生都认为职业角色模型相当直观,并且可以轻松地将各种角色与过往的经历联系起来;然而,硕士生的角色偏好和选择与该角色一致的空缺职位之间相互矛盾;学生们渴望得到提高职业认知方面的支持,希望用岗位介绍或职位空缺来丰富对不同角色的描述,并以多种方式将该模型整合到教学中。
Abstract:
A better understanding of the professional future has positive outcomes for student learning and job satisfaction.However, engineering students are often unaware of what kind of engineer they want to be and what professional competences it requires. To support engineering students to become more aware of their future possibilities and requirements, a Professional Roles Model for Future Engineers was developed and validated by industry. Three professional roles were defined and competency profiles were developed in close cooperation with engineers and HR-representatives from different sectors. This study aims to investigate how students perceive the model and to what extent they could identify themselves with the professional roles. We found even when graduating, students find it difficult to describe their career aspirations. Both Bachelors and Masters’ students found the model rather intuitive and could easily link the roles with previous experiences. However, we noticed for the Masters’ students a discrepancy between the preferred role and the choice for a vacancy aligned with a role. Students appealed most strongly to the roles of operational excellence and product leadership as they recognised these roles the most from the curriculum. Students were eager to be supported in increasing career awareness. They saw several possibilities to implement the model on the premise that it was made more concrete. They suggested enriching the description of the roles with testimonies or job vacancies and integrating the model in several ways.

相似文献/References:

[1]余天佐,蒋建伟,任锐,等.基于工程教育认证标准的持续质量改进——以Z大学全国示范性软件工程专业为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):104.
[2]李 越 李曼丽 乔伟峰 李 雪 赵 薇 张晓蕾.政策与资源:面向工业化的高等教育协同创新[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(06):1.
[3]林健.面向未来的中国新工科建设[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(02):26.
[4]林健 郑丽娜.从大国迈向强国:改革开放40年中国工程教育[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(02):1.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.02.000117]
 LIN Jian ZHENG Li-na.From the Big Country to the Strong One:China’s EngineeringEducation in the 40 years of Reform and Opening-Up[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(03):1.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.02.000117]
[5]尤 政.建设世界一流工科 引领工程教育发展[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(03):1.
 YOU Zheng.Building?World-class?Engineering?Discipline?andLeading?the?Development?of?Engineering?Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(03):1.
[6]徐立辉 王孙禺.跨学科合作的工科人才培养新模式 ——工程教育的探索性多案例研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(05):107.
 XU Li-hui WANG Sun-yu.New Mode of Engineering Talents Training Based on Interdisciplinary Cooperation: An Exploratory Multi-Case Study of Engineering Education[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(03):107.
[7]杰蒂·埃格兰德·霍尔加德 安奈特·科莫斯.工程教育中的学生-企业协作模式——提升就业能力的教育设计[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(03):65.
 Jette Egelund Holgaard Anette Kolmos.Differences in Company Projects——A Way of Inspiring Educational Design for Employability[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(03):65.
[8]彭 林?Brent Jesiek.历史制度主义视角下美国产学研合作教育政策变迁研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(06):52.
 PENG Lin ??Brent Jesiek.The Study on Policy Changes of the Cooperative Education in United States from the Perspective of Historical Institutionalism[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(03):52.
[9]齐书宇 黄丹宁.从多维分裂到融合建构:本科生工程实践能力培养的争议与反思[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(02):84.
 QI Shu-yu HUANG Dan-ning.From Multidimensional Splitting to Fusion Construction: Controversies and Reflections on the Cultivation of Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Practice Competencies[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(03):84.
[10]林 健 杨 冬.工程教育智能化:内涵、特征与挑战[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(06):1.
 LIN Jian YANG Dong.Intelligentization of Engineering Education: Connotation, Characteristics and Challenges[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(03):1.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-06-20