|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]辛 涛 张世夷 贾 瑜.综合素质评价落地:困顿与突破[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(02):11-16.
 XIN Tao ZHANG Shi-yi JIA Yu.The Implementation of Comprehensive Quality Evaluation: Difficulties and Breakthroughs[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(02):11-16.
点击复制

综合素质评价落地:困顿与突破
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
11-16
栏目:
OA栏目
出版日期:
2019-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Implementation of Comprehensive Quality Evaluation: Difficulties and Breakthroughs
作者:
辛 涛 张世夷 贾 瑜
北京师范大学 中国教育质量监测协同创新中心
Author(s):
XIN Tao ZHANG Shi-yi JIA Yu
Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University
关键词:
综合素质评价教育评价中高考改革
Keywords:
comprehensive quality evaluation educational evaluation the reform of senior high school entrance examination and college entrance examination
分类号:
G40-058.1
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
作为我国考试与评价制度改革的重要内容,综合素质评价全面反映了新时期党的教育方针,也是深化学校教育教学改革的内在动力。当前,综合素质评价落地过程中面临着一些现实困难,如评价内容与指标体系科学性不够、评价主体与方法单一化倾向、评价程序与过程简单化处理、评价结果的呈现与使用存在偏差。为推动综合素质评价落地,发挥学校育人功能,提出以下建议:加强学理研究,澄清综合素质评价的诸多理论问题;优化方法与技术,真实、客观反映学生发展状况;发挥评价的育人功能,促进学生全面而有个性的发展;健全保障机制,促进综合素质评价的常态化、规范化实施。
Abstract:
Comprehensive quality evaluation, as a major part of China’s examination and evaluation reform, fully reflects the Party's educational policy in the new era, and serves as an inherent driving force to deepening educational and teaching reform. At present, in the course of implementing comprehensive quality evaluation, several practical problems remain to be settled, for instance, the evaluation contents and index systems lacking scientificity, the evaluate subject and method tending towards unicity, the evaluating procedures and processes being simplified, and the presenting patterns of the results lacking consistency with the purpose of usage, etc. To promote the implementation of comprehensive quality evaluation, giving full play to the cultivation function in schools, several suggestions are given as follows: firstly, strengthen academic research in comprehensive quality evaluation and clarify related theoretical problems; secondly, optimize methods and technologies of evaluation to truthfully and objectively reflect the development and progress of students; thirdly, give full play to the educational function of evaluation to promote all-round and individual development of students; lastly, consummate the mechanism of guarantee to facilitate the normalization and standardization of comprehensive quality evaluation.

相似文献/References:

[1]王志远 朱德全.“破”中有“立”:新时代教育评价改革的理性逻辑[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(01):99.
 WANG Zhi-yuan ZHU De-quan.“Breaking” Has “Standing”: The Rational Logic of Educational Evaluation Reform in the New Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(02):99.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-20