|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李胜会 朱绍棠.从实现到转化:高校科技创新演变及效率[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(06):53-62.
 LI Sheng-hui ZHU Shao-tang.Realization?and?Transformation:?Evolutionand?Efficiency?of?University?TechnologicalInnovation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(06):53-62.
点击复制

从实现到转化:高校科技创新演变及效率
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年06期
页码:
53-62
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2020-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Realization?and?Transformation:?Evolutionand?Efficiency?of?University?TechnologicalInnovation
作者:
李胜会 朱绍棠
华南理工大学 公共管理学院
Author(s):
LI Sheng-hui ZHU Shao-tang
School?of?Public?Administration,?South?China?University?of?Technology
关键词:
创新效率科研实现成果转化三阶段DEA模型
Keywords:
innovation efficiency scientific research realization achievement transformation Tree-stage DEA Model
分类号:
G644
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
我国提出实施创新驱动发展战略以应对当前经济转型挑战,高校作为科技创新活动的中坚力量,其地位和贡献十分突出。高校科技创新、创新转化和创新效率成为政府和学术界关注和研究的重点方向。针对高校科技创新活动实现与转化两个阶段显著的差别,本文基于创新价值链理论,采用三阶段DEA模型与Malmquist指数法从静态与动态两方面分析2008-2016年我国高校科技创新的实现与转化效率,研究发现高校科技创新实现效率与转化效率总体偏低,从实现到转化出现效率脱节现象,无论是静态效率还是动态效率,规模效率低下始终是现阶段高校科技创新综合效率未能达到“效率前沿”的主要制约因素。
Abstract:
China has proposed the implementation of an innovation-driven development strategy to meet the challenges of the current economic transformation. As the backbone of science and technology innovation activities, universities have a significant status and contribution. In order to analyze the difference between the realization and transformation of university science and technology innovation activities, we use Three-Stage DEA model and the Malmquist index model to assess the efficiency of realization and transformation in Chinese universities in 2008-2016, based on the theory of Innovation value chain. From the perspectives of static and dynamic analysis, the research finds that both of the overall efficiencies in realization and transformation, which are constraint mainly by low scale efficiency, are generally low. And there is a disconnection between the two periods.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-20