|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]彭妮娅.教育扶贫成效如何?——基于全国省级面板数据的实证研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(04):90-97.
 PENG Ni-ya.What?is?the?Effectiveness?of?Education?in Poverty?Alleviation?——An?Empirical Study?Based?on?National?Provincial?Panel Data[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(04):90-97.
点击复制

教育扶贫成效如何?——基于全国省级面板数据的实证研究
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
90-97
栏目:
教育扶贫专题
出版日期:
2019-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
What?is?the?Effectiveness?of?Education?in Poverty?Alleviation?——An?Empirical Study?Based?on?National?Provincial?Panel Data
作者:
彭妮娅
中国教育科学研究院
Author(s):
PENG Ni-ya
National?Institute?of?Education?Sciences
关键词:
教育扶贫成效评价教育经费农民收入
Keywords:
education poverty alleviation effectiveness evaluation education funding income of farmers income
分类号:
G526.7
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究基于柯布-道格拉斯生产函数模型对我国各类收入水平地区的教育投入与农民收入变化进行实证分析,结果表明“三区三州”贫困地区教育经费对农民收入的弹性系数分别是中等收入和较高收入地区的4.1倍和7.6倍,且教育投入的弹性系数与确定性均高于“五个一批”脱贫举措中的其他四个因素。高弹性系数体现出的高效率性和高依赖性说明了教育扶贫方略具有正确性和智慧性,以及在贫困地区实施教育扶贫的必要性和紧迫性。面向2020年全面建成小康社会,教育扶贫应作为扶贫脱贫的高效措施继续实施,保障教育经费优先投入,发挥教育经费投入对农民增收作用的代际效益,阻断贫困代际传递,并探索建立面向2020年后的教育投入长效机制。
Abstract:
Based on the Cobb-Douglas production function model, this paper conducts an empirical analysis of the educational investment in regions of various income level in China and the changes in the income farmers. It shows that the elasticity coefficient of education funds in the poverty-stricken areas of “three districts and three states” is 4.1 times and 7.6 times of that in the middle income and high income areas respectively. The elasticity coefficient and certainty of education input are higher than those of the other four factors in the “five batches” poverty alleviation measures. The high efficiency and high dependence shown by the high elasticity coefficient and certainty illustrate the correctness and wisdom of the education poverty alleviation strategy and the necessity and urgency of implementing education poverty alleviation in poverty-stricken areas. To build a well-off society in an all-round way in 2020, we should continue to implement the education poverty alleviation policy as an effective measure to alleviate poverty, ensure the priority of educational investment, give play to the inter-generational benefits of education funds on the income of farmers, block the intergenerational transmission of poverty, and explore the establishment of a long-term mechanism for education investment after 2020.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴霓 王学男.教育扶贫政策体系的政策研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(03):76.
 WU Ni WANG Xue-nan.Policy Analysis of Educational Poverty Alleviation Policy System[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(04):76.
[2]王战军 刘 静.构建中国特色评价体系 推进世界一流大学建设[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(06):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
 WANG Zhan-jun LIU Jing.Constructing an Evaluation System with Chinese Characteristics and Promoting the Construction of World-class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(04):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
[3]方 超 黄 斌.高校扩招政策能够提高农村劳动力的大学教育收益吗?[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(01):121.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.012112]
 FANG Chao HUANG Bin.Could the Enrollment Expansion Policy Increase the Rate of Return on Higher Education of Rural Labor Force?[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(04):121.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.012112]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-20