|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙晶 张伟 任宗金 王殿龙 崔岩.工程教育专业认证毕业要求达成度的成果导向评价[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):117-124.
 SUN Jing ZHANG Wei REN zong-jin WANG dian-long CUI Yan.Practice on OBE Evaluation Architecture for the Achievement of GraduationRequirements Based on the Engineering Education Accreditation System[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(04):117-124.
点击复制

工程教育专业认证毕业要求达成度的成果导向评价
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
117-124
栏目:
教育政策与管理
出版日期:
2017-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Practice on OBE Evaluation Architecture for the Achievement of GraduationRequirements Based on the Engineering Education Accreditation System
作者:
孙晶 张伟 任宗金 王殿龙 崔岩
大连理工大学机械工程学院
Author(s):
SUN Jing ZHANG Wei REN zong-jin WANG dian-long CUI Yan
School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology
关键词:
成果导向教育课程考核成绩分析法尺规评价法工程教育专业认证毕业要求达成度
Keywords:
OBE analytical method based on exam scores Rubrics method engineering education accreditation system graduation requirements achievement
分类号:
G647
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对目前高校工程教育专业认证中有关毕业要求达成度评价方法中存在的问题,作者提出成果导向评价构架。该评价构架包括课程考核成绩分析法、评价尺规法和问卷调查法。在建立毕业要求指标点与课程支撑关系前提下,确定课程对毕业能力要求支撑的权重系数;由课程评价中对指标点达成度的评价值及其权值,计算指标点达成度数值,并与目标值进行对比,得到每个指标点的达成度评价结果;综合衡量每个指标点的达成度评价情况,得到基于课程考核成绩分析法的毕业要求达成情况。对于评价尺规法,首先建立评价尺规基本模型,并获取学生对课程支撑的毕业要求的定量评价和样本数据,生成基于样本空间平均分的评价尺规表;根据此样本尺规表,教学指导委员会成员给出评价意见,主讲教师据此进行反馈,写出整改措施。对于调查问 卷法,覆盖了在校生、毕业生和用人单位的三方调查问卷在内容上做到了全面性、去主观性以及被调查方的审慎性,获得的结果验证了通过课程考核成绩分析法和尺规评价法所获得的毕业要求达成度。
Abstract:
According to the main issue about the achievement of graduation requirements in engineering education accreditation system, this paper proposes the value of OBE evaluation architecture that consists of exam scores analytical method, rubrics method and questionnaire survey method. Based on the precondition of establishments on the relationship between graduation requirements evaluation indicator and course support, this paper confirms the ratio which suggests weight coefficients of the courses versus graduation requirements. It furthermore calculates the value of achievement indicator by evaluation value of the achievement indicator and its weight coefficient. Moreover, compare with objective value, the analysis suggests the results of the achievement evaluation for every indicator. In terms of Rubrics method, this study firstly builds the basic model for Rubrics method, then gets the quantitative graduation requirements evaluation from students, which is followed by a formation of Rubrics evaluation table by using sample spaces average score. The steering committee of education gives evaluation suggestions with Rubrics evaluation table. Then the course instructors provide feedback and the rovement measures. The method of questionnaire survey targets to gather data among campus students, graduates and employers. Because of the comprehensiveness, objectivity and prudence of surveyed parties, the results of the questionnaire survey method triangulate the results of analytical method based on exam scores and Rubrics method.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-20