|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张继龙陈廷柱.大学的学院学术治理现状及其改进——基于24所本科院校的调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(04):94-100.
 ZHANG Ji-longCHEN Ting-zhu.Statues and Improvement of Academic Governance at University and Schools in China[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(04):94-100.
点击复制

大学的学院学术治理现状及其改进——基于24所本科院校的调查
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
94-100
栏目:
教育政策与管理
出版日期:
2017-10-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Statues and Improvement of Academic Governance at University and Schools in China
作者:
张继龙1陈廷柱2
1.上海师范大学 国际与比较教育研究院 2.华中科技大学 教育科学研究院
Author(s):
ZHANG Ji-long1CHEN Ting-zhu2
1.School of Education, Shanghai Normal University2..School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
关键词:
学术治理决策方式学术委员会学院
Keywords:
academic governancedecision-making modeacademic committeeSchools of university
分类号:
G647
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
学院学术治理具有基础性和复杂性的特征。对24所本科院校的96个学院的问卷调查表明:我国大学的学院学术治理方式以党政联席会决策为主导,以学术委员会决策为补充;行政力量的主导程度在非研究型大学中更为突出,而学术力量的集体表现在研究型大学中更胜一筹;学院学术委员会的运行规范程度和治理效果有待提升。改进学院学术治理是一项系统工程,而其关键在于重塑学术治理中的权力格局。
Abstract:
The nature of academic governance in Schools is basic and complex. Based on data gathered from 96 Schools at 24 universities, this research shows that the Party-government Joint Committee dominantly controls the school’s academic governance of universities in China and shares some power with the academic committee. the degree of dominance of the administrative power at non-research universities is more obvious whereas the collective expression of the academic power at research universities is more outstanding. The findings furthermore suggest that the operation norm and effectiveness of the School academic committees needs to be improved. However, improving the academic governance in Schools is regarded as a systematic project and the key is to reshape its power pattern.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-08-20