|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]姚思宇 王璐瑶 武康平.公共利益还是商业利益? ——双重价值导向下高校科研行为的决策逻辑、前因动机与现实挑战[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(06):134-144.
 YAO Si-yu WANG Lu-yao WU Kang-ping.Public Interest or Commercial Interest? ——The Decision-Making Logic, Antecedent Motivation and Practical Challenges of University Research Behavior under Dual Value Orientation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(06):134-144.
点击复制

公共利益还是商业利益? ——双重价值导向下高校科研行为的决策逻辑、前因动机与现实挑战
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
134-144
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2023-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Public Interest or Commercial Interest? ——The Decision-Making Logic, Antecedent Motivation and Practical Challenges of University Research Behavior under Dual Value Orientation
作者:
姚思宇1 王璐瑶2 武康平3
1.北京化工大学 文法学院;2.中国传媒大学 经济与管理学院;3.清华大学 经济管理学院
Author(s):
YAO Si-yu1 WANG Lu-yao2 WU Kang-ping3
1.College of Humanities and Law, Beijing University of Chemical Technology; 2.School of Economics and Management, Communication University of China; 3.School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
关键词:
高校科研公共利益商业利益决策逻辑治理变革
Keywords:
university research public interest commercial interest decision-making logic governance reform
分类号:
G644
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
公共利益与商业利益双重价值导向下高校科研行为决策的冲突与平衡是知识经济时代高校需要长期且持续应对的重要议题。研究关注公共利益与商业利益导向下高校科研行为的决策逻辑、前因动机与现实挑战。研究发现,公共利益导向下高校遵循公开科研成果、快速分享成果和科学价值至上的决策逻辑,商业利益导向下高校则采取优先专利确权、科研成果保密和实用主义至上的决策逻辑,两种决策逻辑的内生与外源前因动机有着显著差别,出现主责冲突、激励困境与政策两难等现实挑战,提出营造潜心深耕科研环境、完善精准专业管理制度、构筑联动协同政策体系的治理变革建议。
Abstract:
In the knowledge economy era, universities are grappling with conflict and equilibrium in research decision-making shaped by the dual value orientation of public and commercial interests. This study delves into the decision-making logic, underlying motivations, and contemporary challenges of university research activities guided by public and commercial imperatives. Findings suggest that universities adhere to a logic of openness, rapid sharing, and scientific supremacy under public interest while prioritizing patent rights, secrecy, and pragmatism under commercial interest. Distinct intrinsic and extrinsic motivations characterize the two decision-making logics, giving rise to challenges such as role conflicts, incentive paradoxes, and policy conundrums. The study proposes governance reforms, including fostering a nurturing research environment, refining precise management systems, and establishing a coordinated policy framework.

相似文献/References:

[1]杜宁凯.世界一流大学的未来[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(02):1.

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-20