|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙玉涛?柳玉梅?陈灵芝?刘连峰.我国高校研发经费:规模、结构及建议[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(04):60-67.
 SUN Yu-tao?LIU Yu-mei?CHEN Ling-zhi?LIU Lian-feng.Research?and?Development?Funds?in?Chinese?Universities:?Scale,?Structure?and?Suggestions[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):60-67.
点击复制

我国高校研发经费:规模、结构及建议
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
60-67
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2020-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research?and?Development?Funds?in?Chinese?Universities:?Scale,?Structure?and?Suggestions
作者:
孙玉涛1?柳玉梅1?陈灵芝1?刘连峰2
1.大连理工大学 经济管理学院 2.大连理工大学 科技创新创业与产业转型研究中心
Author(s):
SUN Yu-tao1?LIU Yu-mei1?CHEN Ling-zhi1?LIU Lian-feng2
1.School?of?Economics?and?Management,?Dalian?University?of?Technology 2.Research Center?for?S&T?Innovation?and?Entrepreneurship?and?Industrial?Transformation,?Dalian?University?of?Technology
关键词:
高校研发经费规模类型结构集中度
Keywords:
university R&D funds scale structure concentration
分类号:
G647.5
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
高校作为国家创新体系的重要组成部分,其研发活动是国家创新的源头。本文通过国际比较、部门比较和集中度分析对1995-2017年我国高校研发经费的整体规模、研发类型结构和组织配置结构进行系统研究。研究结果表明:1995年以来,我国高校研发经费规模稳步增长,虽然与美国仍然有较大差距,但是已经超越大部分G7国家;高校在国家创新体系中的位置正在下滑,研发类型结构从应用研究“一枝独秀”向基础研究与应用研究“齐头并进”演进;高校研发经费主要集中配置在高水平研究型大学群体,但是集中度低于美国。
Abstract:
As an important part of the national innovation system, universities are the core driving force for national innovation. This paper systematically analyzes the overall scale, research and development (R&D) type and structure, and organizational allocation structure of R&D funds in Chinese universities from 1995 to 2017 through international comparison, department comparison, and concentration analysis. The results show that since 1995, the scale of Chinese universities’ R&D expenditure has steadily increased. Although still far below that of the United States, the total R&D expenditure has surpassed most other G7 countries. It is also found that the position of universities in the national innovation system is declining. The “outshining” of basic research alone has evolved to “advancing together” of basic and applied research. The R&D funds for Chinese universities is mainly distributed in a few high-level research universities, but the concentration is lower than that in the United States.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘惠琴 王传毅 李锋亮 赵 琳 程 哲.研究生教育发展指数之构建研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):114.
 LIU Hui-qin WANG Chuan-yi LI Feng-liang ZHAO Lin CHENG Zhe.Research on the construction of Graduate Education Development Index[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):114.
[2]李锋亮 吴 帆 顾袁超 刘惠琴.省域硕士研究生教育发展指数分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):125.
 LI Feng-liang WU Fan GU Yuan-chao LIU Hui-qin.Research on the Master Education Development Index in Provinces[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):125.
[3]王传毅 程 哲 赵 琳 刘惠琴.省域博士研究生教育发展指数分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):133.
 WANG Chuan-yi CHENG Zhe ZHAO Lin LIU Hui-qin.Research on the Doctoral Education Development Index in Provinces[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):133.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-20