|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]罗志敏孙艳丽郝艳丽.从“结构-制度”到“制度-生活”:新时期中国大学内部治理研究的视角转换[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(06):64-72.
 LUO Zhi-min SUN Yan-li HAO Yan-li.From?“Structure-?Institution”?to?“Institution-Life”:?TheConversion?of?the?Research?Perspective?on?the?InternalGovernance?of?Chinese?Universities?in?the?New?Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(06):64-72.
点击复制

从“结构-制度”到“制度-生活”:新时期中国大学内部治理研究的视角转换
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2019年06期
页码:
64-72
栏目:
教育历史与文化
出版日期:
2019-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
From?“Structure-?Institution”?to?“Institution-Life”:?TheConversion?of?the?Research?Perspective?on?the?InternalGovernance?of?Chinese?Universities?in?the?New?Era
作者:
罗志敏1孙艳丽2郝艳丽1
1.郑州大学 教育学院 2.云南大学 高等教育研究院
Author(s):
LUO Zhi-min1 SUN Yan-li2 HAO Yan-li1
1.School of Education,Zhengzhou University 2.Institute of Higher Education, Yunnan University
关键词:
大学内部治理制度生活制度人生活人
Keywords:
internal governance of universitiesInstitutionLifeInstitutional personLiving person
分类号:
G647
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对于新时期中国大学的内部治理实践,传统的“制度——结构”视角难以形成更为有效的解释力,同时也遮蔽了现实情境中大学内部治理的丰富形态及其复杂构成、冲突和关联。为此,就有必要转向“制度——生活”这种相对微观的研究视角。基于这一视角,大学存在着“制度”与“生活”两种秩序,同时也活跃着“制度人”与“生活人”两类行动者。大学内部治理是由制度人与生活人共同塑造的,表现为制度设计与大学师生的日常生活之间的相互渗透和相互建构关系。结合中国大学内部治理实践进程中的一些具体事例,“制度——生活”视角可为探究中国大学内部治理的微观动力机制提供一种解释框架,为洞察现实校园内的“民情”及其变动轨迹和作用机制提供一个切入点,同时也可为当前大学内部治理的全面深化改革实践带来一些有益的启示。
Abstract:
For the internal governance in Chinese universities in the new era, the traditional “institution-structure” perspective can hardly form a further effective explanation, and also obscures the rich forms and complex composition, conflicts, and associations of the internal governance in a realistic context. So, it is necessary to turn to the relatively microscopic research perspective of “institution-life”. According to this perspective, there are two types of orders in university, i.e. “Institution” and "Living", as well as two types of actors, i.e. "Institutional person" and "Living person". Combined with some specific examples in the process of internal governance practice in Chinese universities, this perspective can provide an explanation framework for exploring the micro-dynamic mechanism of internal governance, a pointcut to thoroughly understand the responsiveness and its changing trajectory and mechanism on campus in a realistic context, and also some useful inspirations for the internal governance of universities at present.

相似文献/References:

[1]周作宇.大学治理行动:秩序原理与制度执行[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(02):1.
 ZHOU Zuo-yu.University Governance Actions:Order Principles and Institution Implementation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(06):1.
[2]李海龙.知识制度化进程中的大学[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(02):17.
 LI Hai-long.Universities in the Process of Institutionalization of Knowledge[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(06):17.
[3]张 衡.大学治理方法论取向:结构主义、制度主义与行动主义[J].清华大学教育研究,2021,(02):25.
 ZHANG Heng.Methodology Orientation of University Governance:Structuralism, Institutionalism, and Activism[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2021,(06):25.
[4]李明磊.我国高等教育评估法律制度:核心规范、问题审视与转向调整[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(04):124.
 LI Ming-lei.The Legal System of China’s Higher Education Evaluation: Core Norms, Examination of the problems, and Adjustment of its Orientation[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(06):124.
[5]刘 霄 王世岳 赵世奎.“蓄水池”还是“镀金店”:博士后制度的国际比较研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2023,(01):111.
 LIU Xiao WANG Shi-yue ZHAO Shi-kui.“Reservoir” or “Gold-Plated Store”: An International Comparative Study of Postdoctoral System[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2023,(06):111.

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-20