|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙百才 徐 宁.香港建设“世界一流大学”的质量保障措施与政策经验[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):75-83.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.007509]
 SUN Bai-caiXU Ning.Hong Kong’s Quality Assurance Measures and PolicyExperience of Building “World-class Universities”[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):75-83.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.007509]
点击复制

香港建设“世界一流大学”的质量保障措施与政策经验
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
75-83
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2018-02-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Hong Kong’s Quality Assurance Measures and PolicyExperience of Building “World-class Universities”
作者:
孙百才 徐 宁
青岛大学 教育发展研究院
Author(s):
SUN Bai-cai XU Ning
Institute of Education, Qingdao University
关键词:
香港世界一流大学质量保障
Keywords:
Hong Kong world-class university quality assurance
分类号:
G510 
DOI:
10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.007509
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
香港进行世界一流大学建设成效卓著,这与其良好的质量控制和质量保障密切相关,香港的质量保障措施对我国内地的“双一流”建设具有重要启示和借鉴价值。香港的世界一流大学建设以卓越学科带动一流大学建设为战略路径,为保证和提升高等教育质量,香港建立了内外结合的质量保障体系,政府鼓励多元竞争性的教育经费投入,高校以国际化视野和办学标准定位发展战略。借鉴香港经验,我国内地需要完善高校自我评估体系,建立相对独立的第三方拨款和评估机构,设立捐赠配比专项资金,实现高等教育国际化和本土化的和谐发展。
Abstract:
The construction of the world-class university in Hong Kong has achieved remarkable success, which is closely related to its good quality control and quality assurance. The quality assurance measures in Hong Kong have important implications and reference value for the "Double World-class" construction in mainland China. The Hong Kong’s construction of world first-class university led the construction of first-class university of excellence for the strategic path. To ensure and improve the quality of higher education, Hong Kong has established a quality assurance system which combines its internal and external aspects. Furthermore, the government encourages diversified and competitive education funds, and encourages universities to position their development strategy from an international perspective and school running standard. Drawing on the experience of quality assurance in Hong Kong, the universities in mainland China needs to improve the self-evaluation system of higher education institutions. Additionally, they are suggested to set up a relatively independent third-party funding and evaluation agency and build a special fund for donation ratio, to realize the harmonious development of internationalization and localization of higher education.The construction of the world-class university in Hong Kong has achieved remarkable success, which is closely related to its good quality control and quality assurance. The quality assurance measures in Hong Kong have important implications and reference value for the "Double World-class" construction in mainland China. The Hong Kong’s construction of world first-class university led the construction of first-class university of excellence for the strategic path. To ensure and improve the quality of higher education, Hong Kong has established a quality assurance system which combines its internal and external aspects. Furthermore, the government encourages diversified and competitive education funds, and encourages universities to position their development strategy from an international perspective and school running standard. Drawing on the experience of quality assurance in Hong Kong, the universities in mainland China needs to improve the self-evaluation system of higher education institutions. Additionally, they are suggested to set up a relatively independent third-party funding and evaluation agency and build a special fund for donation ratio, to realize the harmonious development of internationalization and localization of higher education.

相似文献/References:

[1].文本背后的价值取向———香港校长专业发展的延续与变革#1982-2013[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):68.
[2]张惠 刘宝存.法国建设世界一流大学的战略及实践——以巴黎-萨克雷大学为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2015,(06):23.
[3]李军.中国大学3.0模式——传统、现代与前瞻[J].清华大学教育研究,2016,(04):24.
[4]崔乃文.知识演变与组织创新:世界一流大学的生成机制分析[J].清华大学教育研究,2017,(05):98.
 CUI Nai-wen.Knowledge Evolution and Organization Innovation: the Formation Mechanism of World-class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2017,(01):98.
[5]张淑林崔育宝李金龙裴旭.大学排名视角下的我国“世界一流大学”建设现状、差距与路径[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):24.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.002411]
 ZHANG Shu-linCUI Yu-baoLI Jin-longPEI Xu.Status, Disparities and Path of “World-class University”Construction in China Based on University Rankings[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):24.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.002411]
[6]孙海涛.新时代建设世界一流大学的挑战[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(04):105.
 SUN Hai-tao.The Challenges of Building a World - class University in the New Era[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):105.
[7]王战军 刘 静.构建中国特色评价体系 推进世界一流大学建设[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(06):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
 WANG Zhan-jun LIU Jing.Constructing an Evaluation System with Chinese Characteristics and Promoting the Construction of World-class Universities[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(01):58.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.06.005808]
[8]周文辉 贺随波.世界一流大学的“理性神话”及其形成机制[J].清华大学教育研究,2019,(01):65.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.006507]
 ZHOU Wen-hui HE Sui-bo.World-class University:Rationalized Myth and How It Forms[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2019,(01):65.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2019.01.006507]
[9]王战军 娄 枝.世界一流大学的社会贡献、经验及启示 ——以哈佛大学为例[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(01):26.
 WANG Zhan-jun LOU Zhi.Social Contributions, Experiences and Enlightenments of World-Class Universities——Taking Harvard University as an Example[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(01):26.
[10]郭宝宇 冯倬琳.世界一流大学第三方评价机构的识别系统:外部质量保障视角[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(06):83.
 GUO Bao-yu FENG Zhuo-lin.Construction?on?Recognition?System?ofWorld-Class?University?Third Party Evaluation:?The?Perspective?of?External Quality?Assurance[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(01):83.

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-20