«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:

期数:

2017年06期

页码:

45-51

栏目:

双一流建设

出版日期:

2017-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

On the Perfection of Evaluation of Disciplines in the Context of “Double First-Class Construction”

作者:

翟亚军¹ 王晴²

1.华北电力大学 高等教育研究所2.首都师范大学 研究生院

Author(s):

ZHAI Ya-jun¹ WANG Qing²

1. Institute of higher education，North China Electric Power University2. Graduate School，Capital Normal University

关键词:

“双一流”建设; 一流学科; 学科评估; 学科排名

Keywords:

construction of Double Word-class; world-class disciplines; evaluation of disciplines; discipline ranking

分类号:

G649.21

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

随着“双一流”建设名单的尘埃落地，“双一流”建设的序幕全面拉开。“双一流”建设语境下，大学评估和学科评估面临着新的挑战。针对学科评估存在的窄化、泛化、矮化和固化等现象，从被忽略的评估局限、被夸大的评估功能，被扭曲的评估诉求三个方面进行原因剖析，指出要开展服务于我国世界一流学科建设的学科评估，要恪守去利益化、去行政化、去功利化三大原则，回归学科本真，坚守评估初心，立足国内，面向世界。

Abstract:

As the list of world-class universities and disciplines was released, the construction of Double Word-class has been carrying out. Under the context of construction of Double World-class, the evaluation of universities and disciplines faces many new challenges. For example, the world-class discipline evaluation is regarded as narrow, surface, under-qualified, stereotyped. Therefore, this study reveal reasons from three aspects – under-researched limitations, exaggerated functions and distorted demand of the discipline evaluation. The indicator system of evaluation required to be established. The evaluation of world-class disciplines should obey such principles as non-benefits, de-administration and anti-utilitarianism. It should return to the nature of discipline, back to the original purpose of evaluation, contributing to improve domestic situation and welcome the international views.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-20