«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:

期数:

2026年05期

页码:

123-131

栏目:

教育经济与财政

出版日期:

2026-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Optimizing the Disciplinary Layout of the “Double First-Class” Initiative for Innovation in Future Industries: An Analysis Based on Invention Patent Data

作者:

靳天宇¹ 王拓¹ 刘惠琴^{1 2}

1. 清华大学 教育学院；2. 清华大学 深圳国际研究生院

Author(s):

JIN Tian-yu¹ WANG Tuo¹ LIU Hui-qin^{1 2}

1. School of Education, Tsinghua University;2. Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School

关键词:

未来产业; 双一流; 学科布局; 学科建设

Keywords:

future industries;  “Double First-Class” initiative;  disciplinary layout;  disciplinary development

分类号:

G642

DOI:

10.14138/j.1001-4519.2026.05.012309

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

“双一流”建设高校作为基础研究与原始创新的主力军，其学科布局对我国未来产业创新发展具有重要影响。本文基于发明专利数据，构建学科-未来产业匹配关系，实证分析面向未来产业创新发展的“双一流”建设学科布局情况。结果显示：“双一流”建设高校已成为未来产业技术策源的重要力量，但其潜力有待进一步激发；信息技术学科、新兴交叉学科与基础理科共同构筑了支撑未来产业创新发展的多维学科图谱；从服务未来产业创新发展的角度看，当前“双一流”建设资源配置与部分未来产业技术需求间仍存在一定的结构性不匹配现象。对信息技术及新兴交叉学科的前瞻布局亟待加强。据此，本文提出：以科技前沿为航标，超常规布局优势学科；以产业创新为靶向，推动学科深度交叉融合；以成果转化为引擎，贯通产学研协同链条；以未来潜力为标尺，改革评价与激励标准。

Abstract:

As the main drivers of basic research and original innovation, “Double First-Class” universities have disciplinary layouts that signi?cantly in?uence innovation in China’s future industries. Using invention patent data, this study constructs a mapping framework between disciplines and future industries to empirically assess the disciplinary layouts of these institutions in driving future industrial innovation. The ?ndings reveal that: “Double First-Class” universities have become an important source of technological innovation for future industries, but their potential needs to be further unleashed; Information technology, emerging interdisciplinary?elds, and basic sciences together form a multidimensional disciplinary landscape supporting the innovative development of future industries; From the perspective of serving future industrial innovation, there remains a certain degree of structural mismatch between the current allocation of “Double First-Class” resources and the technological demands of some future industries. In particular, forward-looking planning for information technology disciplines and emerging interdisciplinary fields needs to be strengthened. Accordingly, this paper proposes the following suggestions: prioritizing the extraordinary expansion of disciplines guided by technological frontiers; fostering deep interdisciplinary integration targeted at industrial innovation;strengthening linkages among industry, universities, and research institutions through the translation of research outcomes into practice; and reforming evaluation and incentive criteria using future potential as a benchmark.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-10-20