|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙志军 刘紫彤.高校招生平行志愿改革对生源分布的影响研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(05):78-89.
　SUN Zhi-jun LIU Zi-tong.Impact of the Parallel Application Mechanism Reform in College Admission on the Distribution of Admitted Students[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(05):78-89.
点击复制

高校招生平行志愿改革对生源分布的影响研究
分享到：

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2025年05期
页码:
78-89
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2025-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of the Parallel Application Mechanism Reform in College Admission on the Distribution of Admitted Students
作者:
孙志军1 2 刘紫彤1
1.北京师范大学 经济与工商管理学院;2.北京师范大学 首都教育经济研究基地
Author(s):
SUN Zhi-jun1 2 LIU Zi-tong1
1.Business School, Beijing Normal University; 2.Capital Institute for Economics of Education, Beijing Normal University
关键词:
平行志愿; 生源质量; 生源分布; 多期DID
Keywords:
parallel mechanism;  student quality;  distribution of student;  staggered DID
分类号:
G521
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本文基于2005-2015年全国一本高校的高考招生数据,使用多期双重差分方法研究了平行志愿改革对高校生源质量的影响,并通过异质性分析探索了生源分布的变化。研究发现:平行志愿提高了一本高校的生源质量,且对文科生源质量的提升幅度大于理科生源。平行志愿对高校生源的影响存在着较强的异质性:“985”或“211”高校、东部高校、央属高校的生源质量提升比较明显;不同学科类型高校的生源质量分布也发生了比较大的变化。总而言之,平行志愿的填报模式提升了志愿填报的效率和公平性,同时也加剧了高校生源的层级分化。
Abstract:
Based on admission data from 270 first-tier universities in China during 2005-2015, and using a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach, this study examines the impact of this reform on student quality, and explores the resulting changes in student distribution through heterogeneity analysis. The results indicate that the parallel mechanism improves the student quality in first-tier universities, with a greater improvement observed among liberal arts students compared to science students. Additionally, different colleges have experienced varied changes： universities in Projects 985 or 211, those located in eastern China, and those affiliated with the central government have seen significant improvements in quality of admitted students. The distribution of student among different types of colleges, classified by predominant disciplines, has also notably been influenced. In conclude, while the parallel mechanism improves the efficiency and fairness of the application and admission process, it also intensified stratification among colleges and students.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭艳斌 杜育红.自由流动与政策干预:农村教师生源质量[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(05):110.
　GUO Yan-bin DU Yu-hong.The Intensity of Policy Intervention: The Key of Improving the Rural Teacher’s Source Quality[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(05):110.
[2]林 健.国家卓越工程师学院建设：问题挑战及对策建议[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(02):11.
　LIN Jian.Construction of the National Institute of Outstanding Engineers: Problems, Challenges and Countermeasures[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(05):11.
[3]吴宇川 丁延庆 许 锐 李 菊.新高考投档方式改革是否加剧高校内部专业生源质量的两极分化?[J].清华大学教育研究,2025,(02):136.
　WU Yu-chuan DING Yan-qing XU Rui LI Ju.Does the New College Entrance Examination Archives Submission Reform Aggravate the Enrollment Quality Differentiation of Majors within Universities?[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2025,(05):136.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-10-20