«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:

期数:

2025年05期

页码:

21-28

栏目:

教育学自主知识体系

出版日期:

2025-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

People’s Character： Chinese Exploration of Educational Justice

作者:

吕寿伟

扬州大学 教育学院

Author(s):

LYU Shou-wei

School of Education, Yangzhou University

关键词:

教育正义; 人民性; 权利正义; 伦理正义; 人民正义

Keywords:

educational justice;  people’s character;  rights-based justice;  ethical justice;  people’s justice

分类号:

G40

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

今天的中国既是现代性的中国,也是根植于数千年传统之上的中国。基于传统的伦理正义通过伦理实体之公共善而避免将社会演变为个体的麇集,却因缺乏个体性的权利观念最终滑向权贵正义。而以“权利”为标志的现代正义虽表现出对个体权利的充分尊重,却因缺乏“我们”意识而无法为社会提供实质性的价值信仰。人民满意是中国教育的政治诉求,人民性是中国教育的政治规定。人民性是个体性与整体性的统一,是普遍性与普通性的统一,也是经验性与规范性的统一。人民正义是植根中国传统文化、依据中国社会现实、针对中国教育问题形成的具有中国特色和中国气派的教育正义理论。它打破“现代”与“传统”两种价值体系之间的对立与摇摆,既通过平等教育权利的赋予克服传统伦理正义的权贵化隐忧,同时也通过“我们”观念而避免了现代权利正义的原子化风险,在根本上实现了传统伦理正义与现代权利正义的内在统一。

Abstract:

Today’s China is both a modern country and one rooted in thousands of years of tradition. Traditional ethical justice prevents society from evolving into a mere collection of individuals through the public “good” of ethical entities, yet its lack of a concept of individual rights ultimately leads to a form of justice dominated by the powerful and privileged. In contrast, while modern rights-based justice demonstrates full respect for individual rights, it fails to provide society with substantive value-based beliefs due to the absence of a “we” consciousness. Satisfying the people is the political aspiration of Chinese education, and the people’s character is its political defining feature. The people’s character represents the unity of individuality and wholeness, the unity of universality and commonness, and the unity of normativity and experience. People’s justice is an educational justice theory with Chinese characteristics and style, rooted in traditional Chinese culture, grounded in China’s social reality, and addressing China’s educational issues. It breaks the opposition and oscillation between the two value systems of “modernity” and “tradition”: it not only overcomes the hidden risk of traditional ethical justice becoming dominated by the powerful by endowing people with equal educational rights, but also avoids the atomization risk of modern rights-based justice through the “we” consciousness. Fundamentally, it achieves the internal unity of traditional ethical justice and modern rights-based justice.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-10-20