|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨子豪 张 羽.学生课堂情感投入量表的开发与检验[J].清华大学教育研究,2024,(02):135-143.
 YANG Zi-hao ZHANG Yu.Development and Validation of Student Classroom Emotional Engagement Scale (CEES)[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2024,(02):135-143.
点击复制

学生课堂情感投入量表的开发与检验
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
135-143
栏目:
教育改革与发展
出版日期:
2024-04-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development and Validation of Student Classroom Emotional Engagement Scale (CEES)
作者:
杨子豪 张 羽
清华大学 教育研究院
Author(s):
YANG Zi-hao ZHANG Yu
Institute of Education, Tsinghua University
关键词:
学习投入课堂情感投入量表编制
Keywords:
classroom engagement emotional engagement scale development
分类号:
G424
摘要:
学生情感投入是课堂学习投入的重要维度,日益受到教育研究者和实践者的关注。然而,学术界对学生情感投入概念的讨论并不充分,大多只关注学生的情感状态,而忽视了学生对自身和学习共同体的情感调节过程。这导致实证研究对情感投入的测量准确性受限。本研究以课堂为主要场景,深入分析课堂情感投入的概念内涵,关注“状态与调节”和“个体与共同体”两组辩证关系,从情感状态、情感自我调节和情感共同调节三个维度构建更全面的学生课堂情感投入量表,并进行了系统的心理计量检验。研究结果表明,学生课堂情感投入量表具有良好的测量学特质,可以作为中小学课堂情感投入调查和课堂教学管理的可靠工具。
Abstract:
Most of the existing classroom emotional engagement scales (CEES)focus on students’ emotional states but ignore the dynamic process of students’ emotional regulation of themselves and the learning community, which leads to limitations in the accuracy of classroom emotional engagement measurement. In this study, we analyzed the connotation of emotional engagement in the classroom, paid attention to the dialectical relationship between “state and regulation” and “individual and community,” and constructed a more comprehensive scale of students’ emotional engagement in the classroom from the three dimensions of emotional state, emotional self-regulation and emotional co-regulation, and conducted a systematic psychometric trait test. A systematic test of psychometric properties was conducted. The study utilized various reliability and validity analyses and proved that the CEES has a robust factor structure, a reasonable distribution of factor scores, good reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, structural validity, and calibration validity, and can be used as a reliable tool for the investigation of classroom affective engagement in primary and secondary schools and for classroom teaching management.

相似文献/References:

[1]牛新春.迎头赶上:来自不同地域学生的大学学业表现的实证案例研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(01):91.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.009111]
 NIU Xin-chun.Catching Up-Academic Performance of Students from Different Regions[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(02):91.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.01.009111]
[2]马 婧韩锡斌程建钢.促进学习投入的混合教学活动设计研究[J].清华大学教育研究,2018,(03):67.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.03.0067-09]
 MA Jing HAN Xi-bin CHENG Jian-gang.Research on Activity Design of Blended Instruction to Promote Student Engagement[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2018,(02):67.[doi:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2018.03.0067-09]
[3]汪卫平 胡平平 李 威.精英大学理工科有助于农村学生继续逆袭吗? ——基于家庭背景、学习投入与学习收获的关系探讨[J].清华大学教育研究,2022,(06):121.
 WANG Wei-ping HU Ping-ping LI Wei.Do the Rural Students Benefits More from STEM Major in a Chinese Elite University?[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2022,(02):121.

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-20