|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李立国.大学治理变迁的理论框架:从学术-政府-市场到大学-国家-社会[J].清华大学教育研究,2020,(04):1-9.
 LI Li-guo.A?Theoretical?Framework?to?Explain?Changes?in?UniversityGovernance:From?Academy-Government-Market?to?University-State-Society[J].TSINGHUA JOURNAL OF EDUCATION,2020,(04):1-9.
点击复制

大学治理变迁的理论框架:从学术-政府-市场到大学-国家-社会
分享到:

清华大学教育研究[ISSN:1001-4519/CN:11-1610/G4]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
1-9
栏目:
OA栏目
出版日期:
2020-08-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
A?Theoretical?Framework?to?Explain?Changes?in?UniversityGovernance:From?Academy-Government-Market?to?University-State-Society
作者:
李立国
中国人民大学 教育学院
Author(s):
LI Li-guo
College?of?Education,?Renmin?University?of?China
关键词:
大学组织国家社会自主性治理
Keywords:
university organization state society autonomy governance
分类号:
G640
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
大学知识生产与应用的逻辑变迁改变了大学的组织边界,但没有改变大学组织的自主性。大学治理不再单纯局限于学术权威,而应把大学组织作为一个治理整体,政府可以扩展为国家,市场可以扩展为社会,学术—政府—市场的三角模型可以拓展为大学—国家—社会的三角模型。作为自主性组织的大学治理,在与国家、社会的互动中要保持适度的组织边界,通过制度供给与治理能力的良性互动,实现大学的“善治”。
Abstract:
The logical transition in the production and application of university knowledge changed the organizational boundaries of the university, but did not change the autonomy of the university organization. University governance is no longer confined to academic authority, but should be regarded as a whole governance of the university organization. The government can be extended to the country, the market can be extended to society, and the academy-government-market triangle model can be extended to a university-state-society triangle. model. As an autonomous organization, university governance must maintain appropriate organizational boundaries in its interaction with the state and society, and could achieve “good governance” of universities through the optimum interaction between institutional supply and governance capabilities.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨悦.教育为国家建设服务———1950年高教界关于“理论与实际一致”的争论[J].清华大学教育研究,2014,(2):76.

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-08-20